To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: RPMs
> "James Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Because my office network and CD writer, in a concerted attempt, do
> > not wish me to copy any file that ends with .tar or .
You may remember my plea for assistance for help with
installing the JDK and all the archiving problems I had. I was wondering if
there was a concerted effort, anywhere, to create RPMs of the latest
releases.
Because my office network and CD writer, in a concerted
attempt, do not wish me t
30am here so I'll goto bed and see how I get on tomorrow.
Thanks for all your help,
James.
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: James Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 10:33 PM
Subject: Re
et it
> all up in your login environment). Another difference between Unix and
> Win32, but not a bad one, in my opinion.
>
> --Jeff
>
>
> James Butler wrote:
> >
> > Ahhh! I understand. I think.
> >
> > So, although java, javac etc. are not physi
the jdk on the directory structure of the Win32
version of Java and expected to see the runtimes in jdk1.2/bin and as I
didn't I hunted round until I did.
Many thanks,
James.
>On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 04:22:33 PST, James Butler wrote:
>
> >That's strange as the Blackdown distribut
at 10:09:49PM -, James Butler wrote:
>Maybe I'm just not cut out for Linux as this is probably such an easy
>problem and I >have overlooked the obvious.
You definitely need the glibc2.1 version with RH6.0.
Check that your various environment variables are consistent:
JAVA_
Maybe I'm just not cut out for Linux as this is probably such
an easy problem and I have overlooked the obvious.
I loaded up jdk1.2 onto Red Hat 6.0 (using both glibc2.0 AND
glibc2.1 out of desperation) and just to test I tried running java and got the
following error...
./java: error in
