ans to provide one? I have managed to
> copmpile and install Mozilla but would like to use the plugin for Mozilla.
>
>
--
=======
Johan Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ses
mpiler problem.
The intention was to go to 1.4 immediately, and to skip improvements on
1.3.0 or 1.3.1. Unless people really require it...
- Johan
=======
Johan Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sesua
Or if you have no sparc boxes, I can help with that.
>
> System configuration:
>
> Linux kernel 2.2.19
> glibc 2.1.3
> binutils 2.10.1
> gcc 2.95.3
>
> not forgetting X11 - Xfree86 4.0.3.
>
> running on sparc32.
>
> Alex.
>
--
=
/Linux. Anyone want to comment?
Yes, we will continue the SPARC/Linux port.
kr,
- Johan
=======
Johan Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sesuad'ra Projects
s 2.2.12-42
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Johan Vos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:36 AM
> > To: TAZ Gravel, Emmanuel
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:Re: Segfault on Sparc20 with 1.2.2 RC4
> >
&g
===
Johan Vos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sesuad'ra Projects http://www.sesuadra.org
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Avi Cherry wrote:
> I've had a few problems with the sparc port of the Bla
Concerning the problems with JDK 1.1.6 on sparclinux:
The binary in the distribution is built on a libc5-system, while Red Hat
5.2 comes with glibc. If you have the corresponding libs installed on your
RH 5.2 system, the thing should work however.
JDK 1.2 will be built on a glibc-system, so you pr
Red Hat 5.1 on Sparc uses glibc, while the JDK-port for sparclinux is
built using libc-5 (which was distributed with Red Hat 4.x).
I was working on a glibc-port (http://www.sesuadra.org/~jdk), but since
JDK 1.2 is due to be out soon, I think it is better to work on a JDK 1.2
port for sparclinux gl
