Re: Volano Report update

support it. If Java and NPTL are working together already, that changes everything. Just when I thought I was done testing for a while ... John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: Volano Report update

before we see any benefits. I read that IBM needs to make changes in their Java VM on Linux to support it, for example. Is that correct? John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Volano Report update

27;t help much either: Configurable Request http://www.spec.org/cgi-bin/osgresults?conf=jbb2000;op=form John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Volano Report update

s to compare the message throughput at 50,000 connections on a new Hyper-Threading Pentium 4 with a gigabyte of dual-channel memory, for example. John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &qu

Re: per jvm thread limit

e can use to get Sun's HotSpot Server VM on Solaris there, too: http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/PerformanceFAQ.html#5 Java and Solaris Threading http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/threads/threads.html John Neffenger ---

Re: per jvm thread limit

Add to /etc/pam.d/login: sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_limits.so Add to /etc/security/limits.conf: * softnofile 1024 * hardnofile 10240 Don't forget to add a "ulimit -n 10240"

Re: per jvm thread limit

ally run out of room. That's why I appreciate the "-green" option on the Blackdown Java VM. With user-level threads, you can pretty much have all the threads you want (or, on Java 1.3 without the new I/O, all the threads you need). John Neffenger Joseph Shraibman wrote: I

Solved - Re: Segmentation violation (even with ulimit -s 2048)

may want the Glibc fix as well. John Neffenger John Neffenger wrote: I had been running Blackdown 1.3.1-FCS (green threads, nojit) without any problems for over a year on a system with Linux Kernel version 2.2.16 and Glibc 2.2.4 on a Red Hat Linux 7.0 base. I've been using the "u

Segmentation violation (even with ulimit -s 2048)

7.22.4.18 2.2.4 7.3 2.4.18 2.2.5 8.02.4.18 2.2.93 Thanks, John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Volano Report

l in the Solaris J2SE SDK. > But the HP does not participate with the expert group for the JSR #51. > I feel it is strange. I was pleased to see that Dan Kegel is on the group, though, since he gives the most thorough discussion of the problem: The C10K Problem http://www.keg

Re: New Volano Report

asks or limits in the Linux threads library. The other failures are due to bugs. There are, of course, applications which need good processor scalability. But as far as VolanoMark and our VolanoChat product are concerned, what good is processor scalability, or even superb performance in general, when

New Volano Report

JIT Compiler for Java http://www.openjit.org/ I tried OpenJIT, javacomp (Borland), shuJIT, sunwjit (Sun), and tya. OpenJIT was the fastest in my VolanoMark tests and seemed to be the most stable. Thanks, John Neffenger --

Re: JDK 1.2.2 RC3 and RC1 VolanoMark results

after disabling the socket timeouts, but I'm waiting for the bug fixes before being able to run the tests without modification for the Volano Report. John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: JDK 1.2.2 RC3 and RC1 VolanoMark results

Hi Joseph, > Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to > try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up. See the section called "Download" at: http://www.volano.com/bench

Segmentation violation with 1020 timeout sockets

nd Inprise through this page? http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi Sun and Inprise need to fix both Blackdown Bug Id 1604 and 1578 for me to run the VolanoMark network test with their JDK 1.2.2: http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk/incoming?expression=neffenger John

JDK 1.2.2 RC3 and RC1 VolanoMark results

find any errors in the updated Volano Report. John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Native vs. green threads

at http://www.volano.com/linux.html). I assume the Inprise Java VM will soon do both green and native threads as well. John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sun and Inprise Java 2 announcement

I wrote directly to Sun about it (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], attached below). I'll try to post the results of both JDK 1.2.2 ports -- what I thought was Blackdown *and* Sun, and the new port from Sun -- to the Volano Report today or tomorrow. John Neffenger John Neffenger wrote: > &g

JDK 1.2.2 RC2 VolanoMark results

or comparison scores, see: The Volano Report http://www.volano.com/report.html Looking forward to RC3! Thanks, John Neffenger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JDK 1.1.6 Version 4a and VolanoMark 2.0

#x27;t tried it yet. > Or for that matter with Kaffe (http://www.kaffe.org)? Kaffe can't run VolanoMark (nor our product, VolanoChat), but Tim Wilkinson at Transvirtual Technologies is working on it. John Neffenger

JDK 1.1.6 Version 4a and VolanoMark 2.0

08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html If anyone on the Blackdown Java-Linux Porting Team wants a copy of VolanoMark 2.0, please let me know. Thanks again, John Neffenger