--- Christopher Seawood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using the 1.2pre1 release on a RH6.0 system. I
> started developing
> this app that uses Swing under NT using Java
> Workshop 3.0 with Sun's 1.2
> release. I tried running the app under Linux and it
> immediately exits. I
> don't explic
--- Ozer Irfan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I search information about Java 1.2 certification
> exam.
>
> Have you exam simulation applet ?
> Or documentation ?
If you are taking one of Sun's Java certification
exams, here is the main web page for all of Sun's
educational services http://suned.s
--- "Alexander F. Hartner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have been programming in Java 1.1.7 for a while
> now... and would like to upgrade to J1.2. I have
> been using Linux and Windows and it works great. So
> far I have not been able to run J1.2 applets in any
> browser on my Windows clients
--- Edgar Villanueva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good news.
>
> Sun released jdk1.2.2 in early access in
> developer.javasoft.com.
> I know it's only windows but we need to bang on it
> so that
> when we get the source code for linux it's in good
> shape.
Actually what you can do is just grab t
--- Zhichao Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah. And nobody traded with the People's Republic
> of China.
> What do you mean on this ? American traded with
> People's Republic of
> China now. Nobody means Americans are not human
> beings? They are
> probably not since they throw bombs
--- Paul Matthew Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It might be of interest to the java-linux
> community to know there
> > is a free and excellent class file obfuscator out
> there. It is
> > available at
> >
> > http://www.elegant-
> Thats not a bug, thats just typical behaviour with
> floating point
> algorithm, try to compile and run this little C
> program on your linux machine:
>
> #include
> void main() {
> double d1 = 0.3, d2 = 3, d3;
>
> d3 = d1 * d2;
>
> printf("%20.20lf", d3);
> }
But! Using egcs, C++, an
> What I would like to know is this: how difficult
> would it be to reload the
> definition of a class if objects of the class had
> already been
> instantiated, then destroyed and garbage-collected?
> java.lang.ClassLoader caches Class objects so that
> class files don't have
> to be loaded or
> There has been a request on the Java Lobby
> www.javalobby.org
>
> To reform the java lobby into a grass roots campaign
> to allow Java
> developers
> to take a lager role in the determination of java's
> future.
>
> I urge all the members of this list to look at the
> request and join the
> J
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9905/05/ultrasparc.idg/index.html
I know this is not /. but I felt that this CNN article
had a lot of relevance for the Java-Linux community.
It talks about the business choices that are being
made regarding Solaris/UltraSPARC and Linux. It is
quite interesting an
Well Sun said last week that they would announce their
new plans for Java standardization Tuesday. There a
day late, but it still came. Here's a News.com article
about it...
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,36173,00.html?st.ne.fd.gif.h
It looks like the speculation that Sun would try to go
thro
--- Maksim Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off I want to say that my previous posts were
> done late on friday,
> which is probably not the best time to write
> level-headed posts so I
> apologise if my previous posts were too emotional.
I know the feeling :^)
> On the point of standardi
First off you have taken my intentions to an extreme. I only wish to discuss
these issues openly and in no way am I attempting to create anything. And
also you have highlighted some things in my original post that are not truly
significant to my message. I will point this out below.
> > How i
>Exactly competition is good. But I'm afraid a differ with you Ken on
>what competition, I would prefer just competing implmentations, not
>competing platforms (though even that in some ways is a good idea, eg.
>one OS is not a good idea).
You're right on both, within the Java(c) world competing
> > I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's
> > approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with
> > parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them.
>
>Can anyone please point me to this parametric types proposal? Thanks.
It's on the JDC
>I have mixed feelings (to say the least) about parametric/generic stuff
>in java so I will not comment further on this.
What are these mixed feelings you're referring to? At one point in the past
I thought generic programming was only necessary if you didn't have a common
base class, like in C
>first I'd like to appologize for some of the comments I made
>- I'm aware now that they could be understood as much more
>offensive than I intended them to be.
Good. I felt that you brought up some good points (in between the emotional
sections) and I wish to keep this discussion going.
> > >
>Has anyone checked out the new STATUS page? oh wow... that
>kicks ass... well when its done atleast...
Though I was content with the silence before it is nice to see that the
blackdown developers have responded to this. Maybe now this list will not be
as repetitive.
_
>I usually can't stand flame bait like this but I wanted to point out one
>thing.
How is this "flaim bait"? This is a topic that has been thrown around by
plenty, and unless you work for Sun I see no reason why this should seem
offensive to you.
>This link is the paper 'Sun Community Source Li
>I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's
>approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with
>parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them.
I thank you for pointing this out, but they should have responded earlier. By not
implementing t
I have been programming in Java for over a year, using it mainly because of
its technical merits but also because it seemed to be the "anti-Microsoft".
>From the beginning I had the utmost respect for Sun and their mission to
build Java into the greatest thing since sliced bread. Yet, lately I
>I have token a lloke at the Sun's JNI site. I leared a lot from that
WEB
>site. However in the 5th step -- to create a shared library, it is
just
>Solaries/win examples. I am working on Linux box. when I try to
comiple
>the shared library as following:
>
>(the original command is cc -G -I/usr
22 matches
Mail list logo
