Re: Java shell

2000-03-16 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 01:28:01PM -0500, Timothy Reaves wrote: > I saw - somewhere sometime - a java shell application, that would > let you interactively execute java code. I've lost the link. Can > someone provide some assistance? http://www.beanshell.org/ -Seth -- "It is by will alone

Figured out the RC3 problem ...

1999-12-07 Thread Seth M. Landsman
Okay, the problem with RC3, which exists in the Sun port, si, I think, a problem in how the symlinks are grounded. Specifically, if I change the java -> .java_wrapper symlink so that it is fully qualified (i.e., java -> /home/seth/jdk1.2.2/bin/.java_wrapper), everything is happy. -Seth -

Re: Swing on Linux

1999-06-11 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 12:07:12PM -0400, Nelson Minar wrote: > >How can I get the swing classes for jdk117v3 > > Go to http://java.sun.com/, find the Swing page, and download the > release. All you really need out of it is swingall.jar, put it in your > classpath and you're set. > > A bit more

Re: Swing on Linux

1999-06-10 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 07:45:49PM -0400, Nelson Minar wrote: > I've just started looking at using Swing for my Java project. It seems > really really slow. Is anyone here seriously using Swing under Linux, > without a JIT? Is there some way to improve things? Do JITs make > enough difference to m

admending previous report ...

1999-03-13 Thread Seth M. Landsman
Okay, let me admend the report. Specifying java -green, the system doesn't come up. Specifying java -native, the system does come up. I thought green threads were working and native threads were broke. I guess I'm not paying close enough attention ... Sorry about that. The sys

possible 1.2 problem report ...

1999-03-13 Thread Seth M. Landsman
Okay, I just grabbed and setup in a tmp directory the jdk1.2pre1 on a freshly installed slink debian 2.1 system. I have a research system with a gross number of objects and files which I've written using (exclusively) the various 1.1 blackdown jdks. Under 1.1.7, the system initi

java and glibc2.1

1999-03-13 Thread Seth M. Landsman
Grr ... So debian unstable branch has gone to glibc2.1, which breaks many, many things, including the jdk1.1.7 from blackdown. So, while I really would like to participate in the debugging effort of debian, my lack of having a play machine and the necessity of doing real work h

Re: Offering help on 1.2.

1999-02-01 Thread Seth M. Landsman
> We still don't have anything to work with though, or even > acknoledgement that someone who is dealing with the situation has seen > my request yet. If this was a truly open source project, we'd have > already gotten to the code and fixed it by now :). Instead, we have to > wait for someone to

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Thu, Nov 12, 1998 at 10:46:13PM +0100, olivier Dulac wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a

Re: Linux/Java/KDE

1998-07-21 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 06:27:31PM +0200, Joachim Schaaf wrote: > Joe Carter wrote: > > Joachim Schaaf wrote: > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to port java so that it uses the KDE toolkit > > > > (http://www.kde.org)? > > > > > > I don“t know, but I consider this a good idea. Any volunteers :)

The OSF JDK and TurboJ ...

1998-07-10 Thread Seth M. Landsman
... are not the same thing! There is TurboJ, which appears to be a Java -> Native ahead of time compiler. There is also OSF's JDK, which is a 1.1.6 JDK with linuxthreads support. These are not the same! The JDK appears that it will be free for non-commericial us

Re: another Linux JDK?

1998-07-10 Thread Seth M. Landsman
r: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:06:00 -0400 To: "Seth M. Landsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Randall Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pricing? Details? In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/p