Re: Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

1999-05-04 Thread Tom McMichael
wing and JDBC). Go to http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede/ Let me know how it works for you Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-27 Thread Tom McMichael
at ... http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede/ I'm downloading it right now ... will post if I have success Any comments on this pre-release ? Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-27 Thread Tom McMichael
with 1.1.7 and glibc2.1 either. > Ahh - your right about 116v5 working with glibc2.1. Droped it in place of 1.1.7 and it seems to work great. Anyone know how much of a difference there is between 1.1.7 and 1.1.6v5 ? Ahh no more development on windoze Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-26 Thread Tom McMichael
> For 1.1 you may want to back up to 116v5, or you can try 1.2pre-v1, > but I've personally had no success with 1.1.7 and glibc2.1 either. Has using glibc 2.1 with 1.2pre-v1 been confirmed as working ? (Don't want to download it if I don't have to ... ) Tom McMic

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-26 Thread Tom McMichael
Uncle George wrote: > U just cant wait to bleed. Looks like 6.0 wont be released until may 10 > RedHat 6.0 on FTP servers is available starting today actually -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-26 Thread Tom McMichael
the of course RH 5.2 works great (glibc 2.0.7). Also this is jdk 1.1.7 can't use jdk 1.2 yet ... Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-04-26 Thread Tom McMichael
ke > If there has been an answer to the glibc 2.1 for jdk 1.2 or 1.1.7 - I haven't been able to find it. It seems most messages about glibc 2.1 have gone unanswered ... some have said it was too bleeding edge ... but with the release of RedHat 6.0 - I would hope a jdk for glibc 2.1 would b

glibc 2.1X ... RedHat 6.0

1999-04-18 Thread Tom McMichael
rway ? I personally just need the 1.1.7 JVM for my work ... I would think getting 1.1.7 to work first would be easier/faster ?? Any comments would be appreciated. Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

glibc 2.1

1999-04-13 Thread Tom McMichael
of a hassle ? Any help would be greatly appreciated as I really love using jdk on linux instead of windoze95. Thanks Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-01 Thread Tom McMichael
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_javalinux990301.html According to this article sun says that the 1.2 linux port will be done in one to two weeks. Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Java 1.2 w/2.0.X

1999-03-01 Thread Tom McMichael
Hello, Am I to assume that jdk 1.2 will not be released for 2.0.X kernels and only for the 2.2.X. ... assumed from the status page of jdk 1.2 Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

printing w/1.1.7

1999-02-24 Thread Tom McMichael
I wondering if anyone had info on java printing w/1.1.7 I can only find tutorials on the 1.2 jdk printing ... from the mailing list it seems you can print from 1.1.7. A tutorial site or better yet sample printing code would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED