On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But they have no logical reason to share stack memory. I was assuming
> > the os did things logically. My mistake.
>
> Just curious: do you know of any operating systems that don't
> share the stack memory for different thread
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression that since linux made ever thread a seperate
> > process they each had their own stack and only shared the heap memory.
>
> Threads share the entire memory space. That's what makes them threads
> instead of processes.
But
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Man Chi Ly wrote:
> >>>Physical memory, maybe, but I bet you a nickel you got
> >>>up near 1GB of *virtual* memory. Go learn about how
> >>>thread stacks work. You're not running out of RAM; you're
> >>>running out of address space.
> >>
> >>I guess I don'
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> BTW: If you use another setting than CONFIG_1GB you want to use the
> new release. Older HotSpot versions have problems with the other
> values.
>
So which ones are good? Is the latest sun jdk good or only the
forthcoming blackdown?
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Man Chi Ly wrote:
>
> Dan's probably one of the authorities on this performance issue; but isn't
> it generally considered bad form to be spawning so many threads in an
> application?
Nature of the application. I need to send out a lot of email in parallel.
>
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, John Rousseau wrote:
> The number of threads is limited by kernel config (as Nathan pointed
> out)
I'm not running into that limit. That is something over 14k.
and by available memory. By decreasing the stack size used by each
> thread (via -Xss), you made each thread use
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Hui Huang wrote:
>
> They don't really want to be kicked out of CPU. But you have to
> have those yield()'s inserted into a program because otherwise
I think we've lost a little context here. This started out when I said
that instead of not doing anything Thread.yield() cou
They were in sync. I discovered I got the same message after I killed the
server! I had been playing with my policy file before, and I had removed
the allpermission that had been granted to jdkhome/lib/ext. When I put
that back all my problems went away. The permission thing seems real
screwy
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >
> >
> > The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it
> > wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I co
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
> There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
> got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
> error messa
10 matches
Mail list logo
