On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:20:11 -0500
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think anybody consciously wants to break compatibility,
> but I think it would simply be too tempting to add Just One Cool
> Feature(tm). That's the way Open Source works: when a programmer
> feels an itch, he co
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:20:11 -0500
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think anybody consciously wants to break compatibility,
> but I think it would simply be too tempting to add Just One Cool
> Feature(tm). That's the way Open Source works: when a programmer
> feels an itch, he co
On 2003-08-09 02:22:58 +0100 Gerald Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've started the Java Republic - a news blog
dedicated to core open soure Java building blocks such
as runtimes, test suites, compilers, core libraries,
scripting languages and so on.
[snip]
Any comments?
- Gerald
i don't know if this exactly helps - but i have had the same sort of
error messages from time to time. They don't seem fatal ( on my box )
,and IIRC i tracked them down to using a java plugin for mozilla from
one JDK, whilst having my PATH set up to use a different JDK elsewhere.
Seems a bit wei
the 'laziness' you are experiencing is probably not due to any speed
differences between 1.3 and 1.4, i would guess that it is due the there
not being a hotspot or JIT avaiable for Java on LinuxPPC.
Unfortunately, I do not thing 1.4 for linuxPPC will have a hotspot or
JIT either. There was recen
Does replacing your /jre/lib/font.properties file with this
one : http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/font.properties help at all?
regards, jordan.
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 11:27:27 -0700
"Drew Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, I think I got this fixed by changing a path in the Makefile.
>
>However,
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:34:44 -0700
"Drew Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand there is no JIT or Hotspot in Blackdown, correct?
>
>What's the status of this exactly? Can we expect to see one soon?
>
>I haven't had much problem with Blackdown, but it is a bit too slow
>witho
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:34:44 -0700
"Drew Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand there is no JIT or Hotspot in Blackdown, correct?
>
>What's the status of this exactly? Can we expect to see one soon?
>
>I haven't had much problem with Blackdown, but it is a bit too slow
>witho
do you get a whole list of these errors? if so the solution could be to
replace the font.properties file in ~jdk/jre/lib/ with the one at
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/font.properties
hope this helps ...jordan.
Stuart Wier wrote:
>Running a Java app on my Linux system gives this message:
>
>F
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 20:29, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>VolatileImage is a client-side technology, and Sun is trying to regain
>the client-side foothold it lost by "winning" its lawsuit against
>Microsoft. In the battle for the desktop, winning Windows developers
>with faster graphics is way m
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 20:29, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>VolatileImage is a client-side technology, and Sun is trying to regain
>the client-side foothold it lost by "winning" its lawsuit against
>Microsoft. In the battle for the desktop, winning Windows developers
>with faster graphics is way m
I've just noticed bug 4498974 on the Sun website. Im totally shocked about
this. It was my understanding (please correct me if i am wrong), that the
promised increase in performance with Swing was based around the use of
VolatileImage. Personally, i am interested in using Java for game
develop
12 matches
Mail list logo
