> How about using JTree? That's what we use to store our trees, though
> I'm not certain how suitable they are to standard graph-theoretic
> algorithms.
JTree is a UI element. You could use DefaultTreeNode, I suppose.
> On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, dog wrote:
>
> thomas down wrt:
> > > I
What about javax.swing.DefaultMutableTreeNode
This is a purely data model class - ie it is not restricted nor linked
to visual trees
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 05:07:08PM +0530, Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
> HI all,
> I need to generate a tree structure in my Java app. The size of
> the tree ca
> That solution would work fine, of course. The alternative is a
> `linked tree' structure. Binary trees are easy (just store each
> node's left and right children, and probably the parent). Trees
> with arbitrary numbers of branches are a little more complex. My
> preferred solution is for ea
thomas down wrt:
> > I need to generate a tree structure in my Java app. The size of
> > the tree cannot determined until runtime. THe idea i have is to store the
> > tree as an array using the Vector class. Before i start implementation, i
> > want to ask if there is an alternative approach t
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 05:07:08PM +0530, Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
> HI all,
> I need to generate a tree structure in my Java app. The size of
> the tree cannot determined until runtime. THe idea i have is to store the
> tree as an array using the Vector class. Before i start implementation
HI all,
I need to generate a tree structure in my Java app. The size of
the tree cannot determined until runtime. THe idea i have is to store the
tree as an array using the Vector class. Before i start implementation, i
want to ask if there is an alternative approach to this?
Thanks,
Kart
