To: Spectron International, Inc.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Create an Image without using AWT
"Spectron International, Inc." wrote:
>
> I need to create an Image object in a servlet. The problem
is that the
> createImage() functions seems to need AWT and I can't
c
> Robb Shecter writes:
Robb> Nathan Meyers wrote:
>>
>> It's a "feature" of the AWT.
Robb> This is really a "feature" of Java/X, or Java/Linux, isn't it? I
Robb> don't think that this is a problem on NT.
It's a Java/X "feature". OTOH can you run NT without a display?
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> It's a "feature" of the AWT.
This is really a "feature" of Java/X, or Java/Linux, isn't it? I
don't think that this is a problem on NT.
- Robb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> It's a "feature" of the AWT. A good solution is to run the Xvfb X server
> (part of the XFree86 suite; you'll find it in most distributions) - it
> runs an X server in a virtual frame buffer instead of a physical
> display. That will make AWT happy without requiring a real
"Spectron International, Inc." wrote:
>
> I need to create an Image object in a servlet. The problem is that the
> createImage() functions seems to need AWT and I can't create an AWT object
> in a servlet because it always tries to connect to the X Server. Is there
> something like a MemoryImage
I need to create an Image object in a servlet. The problem is that the
createImage() functions seems to need AWT and I can't create an AWT object
in a servlet because it always tries to connect to the X Server. Is there
something like a MemoryImage class that I can create to use as an offscreen
ca
