Dear All
Have you got the J@Whiz test program for Java 2 Platform?
Could you help me having J@Whiz?
Thank
Nam
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 6:10 AM
To: Christopher Smith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Java
> >
> >Chris!
> >
> >
> >I missed your talk at JavaOne, and not just because it was so early in
> >the morning. ;-)
> >
> >I missed the entire conference because I had some important things to
> >take care of, i.e. work!
> >
> >Are you going to post slides from your presentation anywhere? Can you
Christopher Smith wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's.
> > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this
> > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when
> > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ?
> >
> > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including
> > more natural and efficient integration with native code,
> > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some
> > aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working
> > be
On 31 May 2001 16:09:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ?
>
> Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including
> more natural and efficient integration with native code,
> as well as faster startup and the ability to do some
> aggressive ahead-
I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ?
Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including
more natural and efficient integration with native code,
as well as faster startup and the ability to do some
aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working
better with standard OS tools
Christopher Smith wrote:
> On 31 May 2001 10:58:08 -0700, ed phillips wrote:
> > Thanks for providing this pre-session back and forth. Although I'm excited by
>
> Probably the only way I can get people to show up for 8:30am (someone at
> KeyMedia obviously doesn't like me).
>
> > the prospects a
Christopher Smith wrote:
> On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's.
> > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this
> > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 May 2001 08:24, Christopher Smith wrote:
> On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's.
> >
> > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this
On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's.
> Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this
> libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when JVM
> for Solaris makes use of sola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I meant this to be sent to the mailing list, but I selected "Reply"
originally instead of "Reply To All"
- -- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:23:46 +1000
From: Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <
11 matches
Mail list logo
