On Monday 13 June 2005 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> I'm tring to run a JVM on the Montavista Linux (1.4.24) running on top of
> a Xilinx ML300 (PPC405). I tried the Backdown J2RE and J2SDK but running
>
> > java I obtain an "illegal instruction&q
I tried to diagnosticate it further, but I didn't get far. The error message
is just "Illegal instruction", and the only param I found that doesn't cause
it is "-help" (even "-version" and "-verbose" trigger it). Of course, it appears
only if I c
Hi all,
I'm tring to run a JVM on the Montavista Linux (1.4.24) running on top of
a Xilinx ML300 (PPC405). I tried the Backdown J2RE and J2SDK but running
> java I obtain an "illegal instruction".
Do you know why? Do you know which version of PPC the Blackdown is for?
Do you kn
What's the illegal instruction about? Is it showing anything else? The
1.3.1 release runs fine on the PXA255, but I've never tried it on the
270...
Cheers,
-Dominic
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 22:07 -0700, linux pc wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm
27;t find libjava.so." problem ("uname -m" returns armv5tel instead of armv4).
But now I get an Illegal instruction each time I try to run "java" - could it be a difference between pxa270 and pxa255 (which i saw people run blackdown on) that causes this? (also saw an issue in the
Emmanuel Papirakis wrote:
| I guess) is called, I get the following message:
|
| Illegal instruction
|
| The same thing happens when I am root, or a simple
| user. What could I do about this ???
This has been discussed on this mailinglist before, and is caused by
the use of some PII
Hello,
I finally installed
jdk-1.2.2-RC2-linux-i386-glibc-2.1.2.sh. There is only
a little problem (well, a big one).
Every time .java_wrapper (that means for everything,
I guess) is called, I get the following message:
Illegal instruction
The same thing happens when I
Hi!
I just found this in the bug-report:
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Illegal Instruction when doing anything (e.g. java-version) (PR#1532)
Date: Sat Nov 27 16:31:21 1999
Fixed in RC3 which will be available in a couple o
Yes. I get the same Illegal instruction error on a Pentium MMX 233
running Debian potato (refreshed last night), glibc-2.1.2.
-Peter
Paul Bowman wrote:
>
> The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native
> code
> which is dependent on a Pentium II or new
Hallo Jan,
I'm running an AMD K6-3 400... do egcs (or gcc, whichever was used to compile
the JDK) support Pentium-specific operations (as opposed to pentium-specific
optimizations)?
JB>I tried to run it on a AMD K6-2 450 and it didn't even start up because
JB>of the same error. Maybe, as you sa
processor
> using Slackware 7, which is based on glibc-2.1.2.
>
> Trying the same JDK release on a machine using a Pentium-MMX - 233Mhz
> with Slackware
> 7, I got the Illegal instruction error.
I tried to run it on a AMD K6-2 450 and it didn't even start up because of the same
e
machine using a Pentium-MMX - 233Mhz
with Slackware
7, I got the Illegal instruction error.
-Paul
Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> Odd, no mine worked fine right off the bat. It seems a bit faster to me, but
> other than that I can't tell a difference (I don't do the hardcore-
12 matches
Mail list logo
