Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-19 Thread Jeff Galyan
Jad is written in C++ and therefore probably won't be able to decompile itself. --Jeff Nicholas Wright wrote: > > ;) Ever tried running a binary through a Java decompiler? > > Best Regards > > Nicholas > > > Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 04:02:48 -0

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-19 Thread Uncle George
Maybe the other regetable thing is that it is written in c++, and not compiled on Dec Alpha machiines :-{ gat MARUYAMA Fuyuhiko wrote: > Hi Renzo and folks! > > From: Renzo Pecoraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Java Decompiler > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:11:51 -0500 &

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Oliver Fels
On 17 Jan 00, at 13:12, Jo Uthus wrote: > It's written in C/C++, that's one problem you can't fix with a Java > Decompiler :) Got me... I think I have to take off my JAVA glasses and get back to the real world... :-) OK, and what does it has to do with Lin

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Renzo Pecoraro
Thanks to all!! I installed jad for Linux in a snap, and decompiled my sources. Everything works like a charm, and the source code actually looks nicer than before! I'll be a little more careful with rm -f next time around :-) Renzo -

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Ekkehard Kraemer
Hallo Oliver, OF>So where is the problem then if that is the purpose of this tool ? :-) OF>Ever tried running it through itself ? jad is written in C/C++... MbG, Ekkehard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Jo Uthus
ettable thing is no | > sources are available :-< | | So where is the problem then if that is the purpose of this tool ? :-) | Ever tried running it through itself ? It's written in C/C++, that's one problem you can't fix with a Java Decompiler :) -- Jo Uthus

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Nicholas Wright
;) Ever tried running a binary through a Java decompiler? Best Regards Nicholas > Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 04:02:48 -0700 (MST) > From: "Oliver Fels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:54:20 CET > Mime-Version: 1.0 &g

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Oliver Fels
On 17 Jan 00, at 17:48, MARUYAMA Fuyuhiko wrote: > > I just accidentally deleted a bunch of my Java source files. Anyone know > > a good decompiler that works under Linux? > I think "Jad" is fast and stable. The only regrettable thing is no > sources are available :-< So where is the problem t

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread Ekkehard Kraemer
Hallo Renzo, RP>I just accidentally deleted a bunch of my Java source files. Anyone RP>know a good decompiler that works under Linux? Try 'jad' or 'mocha'. MbG, Ekkehard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: Java Decompiler

2000-01-17 Thread MARUYAMA Fuyuhiko
Hi Renzo and folks! From: Renzo Pecoraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Java Decompiler Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:11:51 -0500 > Help! > I just accidentally deleted a bunch of my Java source files. Anyone know > a good decompiler that works under Linux? > > Thanks!! &g

Java Decompiler

2000-01-16 Thread Renzo Pecoraro
Help! I just accidentally deleted a bunch of my Java source files. Anyone know a good decompiler that works under Linux? Thanks!! Renzo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: JAD java decompiler

1998-10-22 Thread Matt Zagni
Ok well we seem to be missing JAD... I was sent two emails regarding this and countless requests for the info. The link at blackdown has gone (premissions) and the link on http://Meurrens.ML.org/ip-Links/Java/codeEngineering/ that Jauvane kindly gave has permission problems too (but I do like

Re: JAD java decompiler

1998-10-22 Thread Matt Zagni
To All Re: JAD java decompiler Many thanks to all that replied. I have a copy now. Many thanks Matt

JAD java decompiler

1998-10-22 Thread Matt Zagni
Hi, Does anyone know the link to JAD the java decompiler ? Is there a URL around that works ? Many thanks Matt