All the changes you have discussed have been made to the site and to the
ftp site. The only change that remains to be made is to add the same link
to the FAQ. That'll be something SteveW needs to do as soon as he gets
a chance.
Thanks for the helpful comments.
Cheers,
Karl
Dan Kegel writes:
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Dan Kegel writes:
> > > Look again in README.linux.
> >
> > The doc could be made a little more accessible. Did you know there's
> > no link to README.linux on http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html ?
> > It ought to be right there next to the FAQ.
> > It should al
Dan Kegel writes:
> Steve Byrne wrote:
> > John Summerfield writes:
> > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
> > I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-
Robert Ritchy writes:
> Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
> has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
> reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
> give us a quality product and suppor
e 1998 19:15
Asunto: Java app without X installed
>Hi
>
>I'm testing a little application that has to run on a linux server without X
>installed. When I run it on my linux box without X running, it runs fine.
>But when I run in on a linux box without X installed I get the followin
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> > John Summerfield writes:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > >
> > > Well I for
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
can't we all just get along
-rob
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Dug Birdzell wrote:
> all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
>
> recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
> feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point
At 01:14 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the
>a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the
>thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as
>someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I ha
all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point of
getting down on other programmers for asking a question?
Yours,
Dug Birdzell
If you would take the time to observe this list for a while then you would realize
that just about every question is answered almost immediately. I know I asked a
lot of redundant and simple questions and always got an answer. Please, wait for
more than one email as your reference before attacki
5 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Java app without X installed
>
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man!
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
there will be a little
> > understanding and give me a helping hand. I'm not asking you to
> come to
> > my house and do it for me, after all.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Steve Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wed
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Robert Ritchy wrote:
> Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
> has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
> reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
> give us a quality
Bear in mind that privatization of knowledge of technologies which compete
with the Dark Side only serve to empower it.
Yours,
Dug Birdzell Software Engineer HuskyLabs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.butterfly.net/~dug www.lab.com
> "Kevin" == Kevin Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for
Kevin> Microsoft.
Back off! Without his work you'd be using Microsoft!
--
Stephen
---
Perl is really designed more for the guys that will hack Perl at least
20 minut
;m hoping someone out there will be a little
> understanding and give me a helping hand. I'm not asking you to come to
> my house and do it for me, after all.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October
With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for Microsoft.
> > Exercise patience and courtesy in your replies. You too were a beginner
> > once.
>
> Yes. And I didn't ask for help before exhausting the other options, if I asked
> for help at all.
>
Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
> I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
>...
> > I can see no mention
John Summerfield writes:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> >
> > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
> Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:05:39 +0800 (WST), John Summerfield wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
>>
>> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
>Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>I've just installed the jre o
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I've just installed the jre on a system without X. To make the jre even run
I found it necessary to in
hreads/java: can't resolve
> symbol '_XLockMutex_fn'
>
> The jdk I'm using is 1.1.6v4a.
> The linux box with X installed is a Redhat 4.2, the linux box without X
> installed is a Redhat 5
>
> So my question: is it possible to run a java based app w
is 1.1.6v4a.
The linux box with X installed is a Redhat 4.2, the linux box without X
installed is a Redhat 5
So my question: is it possible to run a java based app without X installed?
Does anybode have an idea how to run a java app without X installed?
Wim Ceulemans
Nice bvba
25 matches
Mail list logo
