Glenn Holmer wrote:
> It is with a heavy heart that I post this... IBM has just announced
> VisualAge Java 4.0 with availability in late July, and guess what?
> There is still no Linux version!
Thanks for all the responses, both public and private, to my somewhat
overwrought request for IDE advi
Amol Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am also planning to move from vi to a java editor. Can any body
> suggest it . pls give the links.
> I need this for Red Hat linux 7.1
I think emacs or xemacs with JDE is a good solution. The trick is to
have classpath set for your project before starting up so t
PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2001 02:51
An: java-linux
Betreff: Linux Java IDEs
It is with a heavy heart that I post this... IBM has just announced
VisualAge Java 4.0 with availability in late July, and guess what?
There is still no Linux version! Wow, I'm so surprised! All we
*
Hi,
I am also planning to move from vi to a java editor. Can any body suggest
it . pls give the links.
I need this for Red Hat linux 7.1
Thanks n Regards
Amol
Tony Dean wrote:
Chris,
I tend to agree. Unix in general is a developers environment. The old
DOS environment and Windoze after it are
Chris,
I tend to agree. Unix in general is a developers environment. The old
DOS environment and Windoze after it are abysmal development
environments. It is only reasonable that IDEs came along to fill that
void. In any UNIX environment IDEs never really caught on and I suspect
that is is due to
I do both client-side Swing and server-side development and I use Emacs+JDE
plus Ant for automating the build process and CVS as my code repository.
Even on the client-side, I question whether IDE's aid productivity.
I think that IDE's are a throw back to the days when people had to develop
GUI
& regards,
br1
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von wyrd
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2001 06:53
> An: java-linux
> Betreff: Re: Linux Java IDEs
>
>
> Chris Kakris wrote:
> >
> >
>
Chris Kakris wrote:
>
>
> This probably doesn't really help you but I wanted to raise my hand
> and say that there are people how are very productive even without
> using one of those bloated IDEs. Oops did I say that?
This is one of those dirty little secrets that tends not get mentioned
in th
Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
> But I'm not posting to whine about that; rather I want to ask you
> guys which IDE our company should use instead,
The one that works best for you. :)
After trying 4 or 5 I found JBuilder worked very well for me. I
suppose it does have it's quirks, but I have yet to fin
Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
>
> definitely worth a look. I haven't gotten very far with it yet, but
> what advice can you guys offer? What IDEs should shops with Linux coders
> consider?
>
Well I've tried a number of IDEs over the years and I keep going back
to a simple text editor and build utili
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> It is with a heavy heart that I post this... IBM has just announced
> VisualAge Java 4.0 with availability in late July, and guess what?
> There is still no Linux version! Wow, I'm so surprised! All we
> *still* have is the incomplete and known-to-be-b
It is with a heavy heart that I post this... IBM has just announced
VisualAge Java 4.0 with availability in late July, and guess what?
There is still no Linux version! Wow, I'm so surprised! All we
*still* have is the incomplete and known-to-be-buggy 3.02 that uses
JDK 1.1 with Swing 1.0 (gag me
12 matches
Mail list logo
