Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-22 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
From: Steve Byrne >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > > > >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > > > > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-22 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
From: Steve Byrne >Michael Plump writes: > > On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > > > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? > > > > I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed > > the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) > >Your erro

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Michael Plump
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > Your errors are different -- there have been reports of people having a > completely working environment with 1.9.8 (as I recall) and things failing > immediately with 1.9.9. JDK is starting for you? Do simple AWT apps work? ehhh there was one file I f

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Steve Byrne
DAVID BALAZIC writes: > Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > > > >

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Steve Byrne
Michael Plump writes: > On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? > > I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed > the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Your errors are different -- there ha

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > > > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 m

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
>On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > >> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? > >I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed >the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Reverting to ld 1.9.5 fixes the problems ! Details : jdk 1.1.6v1 libc5

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Michael Plump
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Mich

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >Michael Plump writes: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > > > st

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Michael Plump
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's > using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier > versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem wait a minute...

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Steve Byrne
Michael Plump writes: > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > > stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec > > .

Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-19 Thread Steve Byrne
DAVID BALAZIC writes: > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine. > I upgraded manually most of SW , so I

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-18 Thread Michael Plump
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec > ... FWIW, I also get errors like this when trying

Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-18 Thread Matthew Hixson
David, Just thought I'd let you know that your program works properly on my Slackware libc5 system with Steve's 1.1.5v5 JDK port. Kernel 2.0.32. -M@ -- Matthew Hixson http://www.frozenwave.com/~hixson FroZenWave Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux

Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86

1998-06-18 Thread DAVID BALAZIC
This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine. I upgraded manually most of SW , so I have pretty recent everything. The following