On 1999-12-08 08:29:04 -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is included in the
> Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any other JDK 1.2 if you want.
> At present time there are no plans to port the JIT to other architectures
> than Intel.
Can I us
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:44:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had a single communication with the VP of engineering at inprise, telling
> me that they were interested in dedicated some resources to assist with the
> port. I provided him with Steve Byrne's contact information and that was
Paolo Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixing) the
> > Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and this
>
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Paolo Ciccone writes:
>
> Paolo> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or
> >> support (testing and bugfixing) the Blackd
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:20:46PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > No, sunwjit and javacomp are two different products. sunwjit is what
> > we get from Sun (actually they bought this JIT from another company)
> > as a binary. ja
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:54:44PM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >
> > > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixin
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Jan Buchmann writes:
>
> Jan> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is
> >> included in the Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any
> >> other JDK 1.2 if you wan
> Jan Buchmann writes:
Jan> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is
>> included in the Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any
>> other JDK 1.2 if you want. At present time there are no plan
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or
>> support (testing and bugfixing) the Blackdown team in their
>> porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and thi
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixing) the
> > Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing and
>bugfixing) the
> Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and this seems
>to be the case)
> a production quality JDK1.
Oh guys ! Wake up !
Hands up all those who believe that David and Goliath have the same goals
and ethics.
As my old Grandma used to say: He who expects to be treated by the same
rules in life that he himself follows, is a damn fool.
Many are directly comparing the guys at Blackdown with the _co
Hello to all of you,
I've read the most of the discussion about the blackdown-inprise issue and I'm really
annoyed (even
more i'm pissed off) about the way SUN treated the blackdown-team.
Now I have some questions and most of them are to SUN-representatives on this list:
What I don't understan
13 matches
Mail list logo
