Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2)

1999-01-14 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
on 13/01/99 22:43:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Dirk Vanhalle) Subject: Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2) I disagree on that last point, and I was wondering if anyone else feels the same. (I'm referring to the part about not releasing any

Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2)

1999-01-13 Thread nmeyers
Trevor Harmon wrote: > I disagree on that last point, and I was wondering if anyone else feels > the same. (I'm referring to the part about not releasing any version of > the Linux JDK 1.2 until passing compatibility tests being a good thing.) If you really want to be a beta tester, then I conc

RE: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2)

1999-01-13 Thread Harold G. Andrews II
.02. -Andy > -Original Message- > From: Trevor Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 4:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2) > > > I disagree on that last point, and I was wondering if any

Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2)

1999-01-13 Thread Trevor Harmon
I disagree on that last point, and I was wondering if anyone else feels the same. (I'm referring to the part about not releasing any version of the Linux JDK 1.2 until passing compatibility tests being a good thing.) I think it's not such a good thing because, as I understand it, it prevents any