Re: [OT] jikes [was headed OT: Re: Working with many .java files]

1999-08-02 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: Moses DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In Java the path > name of the file defined what package it should be inside of. NO! It's the package clause _inside_ the source file that defines which package the class belongs to. Whether the source file is in a directory hierarchy match

Re: [OT] jikes [was headed OT: Re: Working with many .java files]

1999-07-31 Thread Nelson Minar
>Are you suggesting that I could do something like this: > find . -name \*.java -print | xargs jikes ++ The principle works fine for me, although you'll eventually hit a command line argument length! The nice thing is you can probably make a generic Java makefile that works with any code. You c

Re: [OT] jikes [was headed OT: Re: Working with many .java files]

1999-07-31 Thread Moses DeJong
On Sat, 31 Jul 1999, Chris Kakris wrote: > Chris Abbey wrote: > > > > A couple people mentioned that javac will recompile any classes referenced > > by what you compile and recompile them if they're newer... true, but DON'T > > RELY ON THAT to save you: it misses the opposite link. Say for examp

Re: [OT] jikes [was headed OT: Re: Working with many .java files]

1999-07-31 Thread Chris Kakris
Chris Abbey wrote: > > A couple people mentioned that javac will recompile any classes referenced > by what you compile and recompile them if they're newer... true, but DON'T > RELY ON THAT to save you: it misses the opposite link. Say for example you > have a static final boolean, and you change