> Gerald Gutierrez writes:
>> If you check the Java-Linux bug database (jitterbug) you will see
>> that I was the one to report this and that Kevin was the one who
>> did most of the work to address this.
> Jitterbug ? Is that the "Bug Reporting" page on Blackdown ?
Not exaclty, JitterBug (
> If you check the Java-Linux bug database (jitterbug) you will see
> that I was the one to report this and that Kevin was the one who
> did most of the work to address this.
Jitterbug ? Is that the "Bug Reporting" page on Blackdown ?
>>> An alternative is Kaffe, but it's too incomplete to be usable right now.
>>> Is anyone working on producing a version of the JDK that uses native
>>> threads ?
>
>I don't know if Kaffe actually uses native threads... Since Native
>Threads do not exist on FreeBSD, it for sure does not use them
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:42:48 -0700, Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>> (Ok, so on older versions, reads from STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR were a problem
>> but this has been addressed)
>>
>
>
>Are you sure ? The following seems to indicate that at least
>STDIN will block everything.
Yes, I am sure - you need to
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:29:19 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>
>> I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is
>> based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block,
>> because everything will blo
> (Ok, so on older versions, reads from STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR were a problem
> but this has been addressed)
>
Are you sure ? The following seems to indicate that at least
STDIN will block everything.
import java.io.*;
public class Threads extends Thread
{
public static void main (String[]
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Alexander V. Konstantinou wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:29:19AM -
> 0400:
> > Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and
> > one of them blocks on a blocking method (i.e., BufferedReader.readLine()
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 09:29:19AM -
0400:
> Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and
> one of them blocks on a blocking method (i.e., BufferedReader.readLine()
> on a client socket) then the 4 other threads are blocking (not run
On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
> I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is
> based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block,
> because everything will block.
>
Are you saying that if my application has 5 threads running, and
o
On 23 Sep 1998 00:31:35 -0700, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>> An alternative is Kaffe, but it's too incomplete to be usable right now.
>> Is anyone working on producing a version of the JDK that uses native
>> threads ?
I don't know if Kaffe actually uses native threads... Since Native
Threads do
Gerald Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm starting to pull out my hair from the fact that the current JDK is
> based on user threads. I can't call anything that can potentially block,
> because everything will block.
"Green threads" converts all your blocking I/O into non-blocking ones
11 matches
Mail list logo
