> To: bryan vold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 25 Jun 1999 01:58:33 +0200
>
> bryan> What is uncertain is whether or not Sun
> bryan> will incorporate some of the constructions that are a part
Derek Glidden wrote:
> I don't know for sure since, as I said, I haven't done a lot of
> multi-threaded programming. I've run a few third-party Java apps, but
> have no idea on the whole how thread-intensive any of them are.
>
> These two classes are a couple of stupid little things I wrote to se
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> OK... so one other question you haven't answered. Are you sure you've
> got two threads staying busy? Most of Java's threads spend most of their
> time sitting around and waiting. If you've really got two threads
> spinning and you're not seeing 100% load, something's str
> bryan vold writes:
bryan> At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little
bryan> about some of the delays. What I got as one of the main
bryan> problems was a very difficult problem of Linux native
bryan> threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said that
Derek Glidden wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
> >
> > > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK
> > > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it
> > > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads,
> > > it only
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK
> > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it
> > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads,
> > it only seems to use a single CPU for runni
bryan vold wrote:
> At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little about some of the
> delays. What I got as one of the main problems was a very difficult
> problem of Linux native threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said
> that they are not only just porting, but also trying
Derek Glidden wrote:
>
> > Dan Iuster wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM
> > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.
> >
> > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using
> > the uniprocessor version on m
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 12:47:17PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> > Dan Iuster wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM
> > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.
> >
> > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues wit
> Dan Iuster wrote:
>
> I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM
> compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.
>
> Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using
> the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ?
I'm curious
> Dan Iuster wrote:
>
> I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM
> compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.
>
> Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using
> the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ?
>
> Any fee
11 matches
Mail list logo
