Hi,
> hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact,
> not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence.
> I've timed tya across releases, and it's gotten steadily faster over the
> last 6 months. The fact that it already keeps up with the sun-supplied
[EMAIL PROTECTED]("J.P.Lewis") wrote:
> I primarily wanted to point out the curious fact that the
> jit supplied by sun for Windows is much faster than the
> jit supplied by sun for Linux, and to ask what this meant.
A possible reason is that they are differing
implementations. The JIT with JDK
>> but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair...
>
>hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact,
>not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence.
I didn't think it was a complaint at all... just can't see the logical
basis for
On Mon, 3 May 1999, J.P.Lewis wrote:
> > but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair...
>
> hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact,
> not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence.
> I've timed tya across releases, and i
> but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair...
hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact,
not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence.
I've timed tya across releases, and it's gotten steadily faster over the
last 6 month
Thanks for pointing out the article, made for interesting reading...
but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair...
>One interesting point is that TYA is on various benchmarks
>2-8 times slower than the Symantec jit included with Sun's java
hmmm... one is developed by a l
