RE: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-18 Thread thanhnam_java
/Linux at JavaOne I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including more natural and efficient integration with native code, as well as faster startup and the ability to do some aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working better with

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
> > > >Chris! > > > > > >I missed your talk at JavaOne, and not just because it was so early in > >the morning. ;-) > > > >I missed the entire conference because I had some important things to > >take care of, i.e. work! > > > >Are you going to post slides from your presentation anywhere? Can you

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-03 Thread David Brownell
> > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > > aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working > > be

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 16:09:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > aggressive ahead-

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread David Brownell
I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including more natural and efficient integration with native code, as well as faster startup and the ability to do some aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working better with standard OS tools

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 10:58:08 -0700, ed phillips wrote: > > Thanks for providing this pre-session back and forth. Although I'm excited by > > Probably the only way I can get people to show up for 8:30am (someone at > KeyMedia obviously doesn't like me). > > > the prospects a

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when J

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Thomas Enderes
Hi, will there be anyone involved with the ARM / iPAQ ports around at the JavaOne ? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 May 2001 08:24, Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when JVM > for Solaris makes use of sola

Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I meant this to be sent to the mailing list, but I selected "Reply" originally instead of "Reply To All" - -- Forwarded Message ------ Subject: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:23:46 +1000 Fro

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 21:25:20 -0700 ed phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if > you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate > them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of > the to

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Excuse me, It is a session not a BoF, but the question still might be helpful pre-session. Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > > Java Technology-

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Chris, It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of the topic to be discussed? Thanks, Ed Phillips Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tue

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > Java Technology-Based Application Server > Java/Linux performance talk > http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/conf/sessions/934/0-sf2001.jsp