Rob Saul wrote:
> Timothy Reaves wrote:
> >
> > I saw - somewhere sometime - a java shell application, that would
> > let you interactively execute java code. I've lost the link. Can
> > someone provide some assistance?
>
> Perhaps you're thinking of http://www.beanshell.org ?
Never heard
Timothy Reaves wrote:
I saw - somewhere sometime - a
java shell application, that would
let you interactively execute java code. I've lost the link.
Can
someone provide some assistance?
jpython is definitely what you are looking for.
Really simple and intuitive.
You can even mix java and
Mo DeJong wrote:
>
> Do you mean Jacl? It is a Tcl port written in Java. The homepage is at
> http://www.scriptics.com/java
>
> With Jacl, you can allocate Java objects and call methods on them like
> this.
>
> set str [java::new String "I am a Java string"]
> set hc [$str hashCode]
>
> It is
JPython allows this, I think.
---Vladimir
Vladimir G. Ivanovichttp://www.leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447 +1 650 678 8014
"TR" == Timothy Reaves <[EMAIL PR
Do you mean Jacl? It is a Tcl port written in Java. The homepage is at
http://www.scriptics.com/java
With Jacl, you can allocate Java objects and call methods on them like
this.
set str [java::new String "I am a Java string"]
set hc [$str hashCode]
It is very cool stuff.
Mo Dejong
Red Hat Inc.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 01:28:01PM -0500, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> I saw - somewhere sometime - a java shell application, that would
> let you interactively execute java code. I've lost the link. Can
> someone provide some assistance?
http://www.beanshell.org/
-Seth
--
"It is by will alone
Timothy Reaves wrote:
>
> I saw - somewhere sometime - a java shell application, that would
> let you interactively execute java code. I've lost the link. Can
> someone provide some assistance?
Perhaps you're thinking of http://www.beanshell.org ?
--
Rob Saul |
-
Oops. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. Turn out that
it is a problem with native threads, and it works fine with
green threads. Thought I tested that...
Russ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
ifference???
I normally run with bash, but also tried ash, pdksh, and csh.
Also, the little class and shell script I posted works perfectly on
a SPARC. :-(
Russ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/19/99 05:44:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Russell Pridemore/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: java shell scr
> No, I'm seeing the same problem with both green and native threads...
>
>
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/19/99 05:17:34 PM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: (bcc: Russell Pr
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:29:55 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>No, I'm seeing the same problem with both green and native threads...
Hmmm... I run Java from shell scripts all the time.
Which shell are you using?
Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
No, I'm seeing the same problem with both green and native threads...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/19/99 05:17:34 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Russell Pridemore/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: java shell script
On Fr
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:10:43 -0600, Moses DeJong wrote:
>I ran into this same problem. I too posted a note to the mailing list
>but I did not hear back from anyone. The really odd part was that it
>only seemed to happen when running with native threads. If I ran the
>green threads version it work
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm having problems running java from within a shell script. The java
> application mostly runs, but I've noticed that it does not receive a
> ^C interrupt and it cannot read from stdin when invoked this way.
> Typing "java ..." dire
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Andreas Rueckert wrote:
>
> > Yep! It's just an easier way to start the JVM.
> >
>
> And not really.
> I haven't managed to get classes in packages running directly from the shell. Has
> anybody done so?
Not yet under Linux, but I've done it unde
Andreas Rueckert wrote:
> Yep! It's just an easier way to start the JVM.
>
And not really.
I haven't managed to get classes in packages running directly from the shell. Has
anybody done so?
Dimitris
Hi!
On Mon, 04 Jan 1999 Peter Schuller wrote:
>> I believe that you can compile Java support into your kernel, or perhaps
>> as a module. In other words, what you want does exist. Check into
>> building a new kernel or using modules.
>
>AFAIK, the kernel support only entails recognition of .cla
This is also a perfect use of servlets - they're not just for WWW
services, you could write just about any service which runs as a daemon as
a servlet. You might have a bit of trouble finding a servlet engine which
fits this niche well - perhaps a modification of the Apache JServ
environment would
This might be a perfect use for JINI technology.
Image a JVM loaded a system boot as a daemon can be sent
java class to execute through a special class loader that is always
running.
Cheers
Chris
Context Grey wrote:
> I think this is a good idea-
>
> I've wanted to write little Unix-style utili
> I believe that you can compile Java support into your kernel, or perhaps
> as a module. In other words, what you want does exist. Check into
> building a new kernel or using modules.
AFAIK, the kernel support only entails recognition of .class files as
executables. The kernel doesn't keep a J
As much as I would love to have something like a java bash
(ok, call me a java junky), there is already something to avoid
continues jvm loading. It's called Echidna. You can find it at:
http://www.javagroup.org/echidna/
You can start different java applications in one jvm.
The author used it al
I think this is a good idea-
I've wanted to write little Unix-style utilities in java, but the
startup overhead is quite large. As such a script written in
tcl or something else "feels" much faster, even though in fact
Java is considerably faster (some things like tcl are *thousands*
of times sl
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Richard Hall wrote:
> I believe that you can compile Java support into your kernel, or perhaps
> as a module. In other words, what you want does exist. Check into
> building a new kernel or using modules.
I've used it. It's no more than a cute trick for loading the jvm: it
I believe that you can compile Java support into your kernel, or perhaps
as a module. In other words, what you want does exist. Check into
building a new kernel or using modules.
Richard Hall
Network Services
University of Tennessee
24 matches
Mail list logo
