Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

2000-08-25 Thread Joi Ellis
hao huang wrote: > > I crossed over some informaiton on the internet last week says that only > green threads is working on JDK 1.2 or earlier realese (may fixed in 1.3, I > did not try). You can search on Sun's web site bug report for details. Good > luck! > > Hao Huang > Avienda Technologies >

RE: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

2000-08-25 Thread hao huang
I crossed over some informaiton on the internet last week says that only green threads is working on JDK 1.2 or earlier realese (may fixed in 1.3, I did not try). You can search on Sun's web site bug report for details. Good luck! Hao Huang Avienda Technologies Tel: 404-262-4358 Email: [EMAIL PRO

Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

1998-10-15 Thread Rudhuwan Abu Bakar
this one I have experienced it. You got a memory problem there. > But when I try something like: > $java Hello > I get: > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > > Full thread dump: > Monitor Cache Dump: > Registered Monitor Dump: > Monitor IO lock: > Child death monitor: > E

Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

1998-10-15 Thread Java News Collector
Andrew, I'd like to say, in the nicest way possible, your java installation isn't using the correct libraries. Either you have a mixed set of libraries or some mixed java code. I would suggest removing previous versions of java that may use the old libc5 libraries, making sure you have a clean

Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

1998-07-16 Thread Steffen Tacke
> Currently i have to develop an application that is based on a C++ Core. > For testing purpose i just called some C++-Functions that simply do some > cout stuff from within a selfwritten Java-GUI. The functions are called > succesfully but if i want proceed in the Java-Programm i ALWAYS get an:

Re: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation

1998-07-15 Thread Dan Fasulo
I had a similar problem with JDK v1.1.x under RedHat 5.0 (i.e., with glibc). It was solved by upgrading to gcc 2.8. libc5 linux systems don't seem to have this problem. Dan On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, Steffen Tacke wrote: > Hi ! > > Currently i have to develop an application that is based on a C+