[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Robb Shecter writes:
>
> > Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> >>
> >> Could you print this glibc version info on the shrinked wrapped boxes
> >> for SuSE 6.3 and for all forthcoming SuSEs.
>
>
> > I browsed through the www.suse.de site, and couldn't find anythin
> Robb Shecter writes:
> Peter Pilgrim wrote:
>>
>> Could you print this glibc version info on the shrinked wrapped boxes
>> for SuSE 6.3 and for all forthcoming SuSEs.
> Hi - while on the topic of Suse, Java and glibc versions,
> [ob java+linux]
> I want to check out this "Java/Web" v
Peter Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Could you print this glibc version info on the shrinked wrapped boxes
> for SuSE 6.3 and for all forthcoming SuSEs.
Hi - while on the topic of Suse, Java and glibc versions,
[ob java+linux]
I want to check out this "Java/Web" version of Sniff+, and have a Suse 6.0
syste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ermirza erekose writes:
>
> Please quote correctly.
>
> >> On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Oliver Fels wrote:
> >> >6.0 is (still) libc5,
> >> 6.0 is glibc 2.0.
>
> > hmmm ... I believe 6.0 is glibc 2.1
>
> Don't mix the distributions: SuSE 6.0 (and we're discuss
Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't mix the distributions: SuSE 6.0 (and we're discussing SuSE here)
> is libc5 - RedHat 6.0 is glibc 2.1.
I think you are mistaken. The SuSe 6.0 which I am running here came
with glibc 2.07. SuSe 5.3 was libc5.
--
> ermirza erekose writes:
Please quote correctly.
>> On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Oliver Fels wrote:
>> >6.0 is (still) libc5,
>> 6.0 is glibc 2.0.
> hmmm ... I believe 6.0 is glibc 2.1
Don't mix the distributions: SuSE 6.0 (and we're discussing SuSE here)
is libc5 - RedHat 6.0 is glibc 2.1.
> On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Oliver Fels wrote:
> >6.0 is (still) libc5,
> 6.0 is glibc 2.0.
hmmm ... I believe 6.0 is glibc 2.1
The latest glibc is 2.1.2
>
> >6.1 is glibc2.0 and
> >6.2 is based on glibc2.1,
> and 6.3 is glibc 2.1.2
>
> Bernd
>
>
> --
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Oliver Fels wrote:
>6.0 is (still) libc5,
6.0 is glibc 2.0.
>6.1 is glibc2.0 and
>6.2 is based on glibc2.1,
and 6.3 is glibc 2.1.2
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
> Peter Pilgrim writes:
> Quick GlibC Question?
> How do you find what glibc2.x version you have?
/lib/libc.so - if you get a segmentation fault, it's glibc 2.0.7;-)
For example:
$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.1.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
[...]
> I couldn't an
do rpm -qa | grep glib
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> Quick GlibC Question?
>
> How do you find what glibc2.x version you have?
>
> I couldn't answer it satisfactorily when asked me this morning.
> ( I haven't downloaded JDK pre 1.2 release yet, because 1.1.7v1a
> works perfectl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > How do you find what glibc2.x version you have?
> As you mentioned, look at your SuSE distribution ;)
>
> >
> > I couldn't answer it satisfactorily when asked me this morning.
> > ( I haven't downloaded JDK pre 1.2 release yet, because 1.1.7v1a
> > works perfectl
> How do you find what glibc2.x version you have?
As you mentioned, look at your SuSE distribution ;)
>
> I couldn't answer it satisfactorily when asked me this morning.
> ( I haven't downloaded JDK pre 1.2 release yet, because 1.1.7v1a
> works perfectly fin on SuSE Linux 6.1 which I assume is
12 matches
Mail list logo
