Re: im sure this question has been asked before but...

1998-05-29 Thread Christopher Seawood
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > I think it would be an amazingly cool and good thing to have a GTK based AWT. You should talk to Doug South <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. From previous talks with him, it appears as though he's made pretty good headway on a GTK AWT. - cls

Re: im sure this question has been asked before but...

1998-05-28 Thread Maksim Lin
Actually I did ask this question a while back on the gtk list (although I called it a gtk java binding, which was probably a poor chioce of terms). From memory, people replyed that this would be doable, but weren't sure whether using another platform specific awt implementation, rather than using

Re: im sure this question has been asked before but...

1998-05-28 Thread Travis Shirk
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Paul Duran wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm sure that this question has been asked several times before but I'm > wondering if anybody has looked at using Gtk for the peer components in the > AWT. Java allows for the peers to be defined by the implementation, and so I > think it wou

Re: im sure this question has been asked before but...

1998-05-28 Thread B. Craig Taverner
> With the current linux trend steering towards Gnome/GTK , it would be really > fantastic for there to be an AWT implementation in GTK. Some ppl mentioned > earlier about implementing GTL l&f in swing, but this would remove that > necessity and also provide a very significant speed increase. The