-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Zdenek" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zdenek> There is no problem to have a stable version of netscape in
Zdenek> any distribution - you just have to use older libc5 version.
No. RH's RPM (as updated) for 6.0 works in 6.0 (at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Nelson" == Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nelson> Could it really just be me? I'm running pretty basic Netscape,
Nelson> about the only change I made was running Fortify over the
Nelson> browser. Trivial applets like
Nelson>
http://
I've tried the libc5 version from several sources (Netscape with libc
compat libs, with 5.4.33 libc from theofilu, Mandrake RPMS, ...) and now
I get tons of those pesky "subprocess diagnostics" windows that lockup
Netscape. Does anyone know what causes these and how to fix it? This
doesn't occur
> OK, we're getting somewhere - the libc5 and glibc versions behave
> differently. Hooray.
>
> I tried downloading libc5 Netscape direct from Netscape, or the mirror
> at
>
>ftp://ftp.the.net/pub/mirrors/ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/english/4.61/unix/supported/linux20_libc5/
>
> I then f
OK, we're getting somewhere - the libc5 and glibc versions behave
differently. Hooray.
I tried downloading libc5 Netscape direct from Netscape, or the mirror
at
ftp://ftp.the.net/pub/mirrors/ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/english/4.61/unix/supported/linux20_libc5/
I then fortified it and r
>Are you running libc5 or glibc compiled version of Netscape??
Yes, you're right. I checked and it appears that my Netscape
binary is compiled against libc5. Here is the ldd output:
libXt.so.6 => /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40011000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/l
> At 14:57 23/07/99 -0400, Nelson Minar wrote:
> >So basically, Netscape 4.61 is whacked for Java. On Redhat 6.0, Redhat
> >5.2, and Debian potato. Yay!
>
> Well, I'm running Netscape 4.61 on the Mandrake 6.0 release, and just can't
> seem to get Netscape to crash at all! The only thing I would s
>Well, I'm running Netscape 4.61 on the Mandrake 6.0 release, and just can't
>seem to get Netscape to crash at all!
Thanks for the info, Todd.
Anyone know how different Mandrake's libraries from Redhat?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . . .
At 14:57 23/07/99 -0400, Nelson Minar wrote:
>So basically, Netscape 4.61 is whacked for Java. On Redhat 6.0, Redhat
>5.2, and Debian potato. Yay!
Well, I'm running Netscape 4.61 on the Mandrake 6.0 release, and just can't
seem to get Netscape to crash at all! The only thing I would say is that
I
Hello,
I would like to add that I am running glibc 2.1 Netscape 4.6 using
Caldera Distroy and your applet was running fine actually.
Matt Brown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
I am runnining netscape 4.61 on Rehat 6.0
I did five test on the circle applet yesterday (nice one) and today with no change in
the set
up of any software
Once it locked up netscape within 5 seconds. No problems at all in the other try-outs
peter van Toorn
>
>
> Paul Ho wrote:
>
> > At 11:58
I'm not having the lockup problem either... althought in general netscape locks up a
fair
amount.. its fun, I get the realiability of windows ported to the linux platform...
Anyhow, that's my two-cents.
Paul Ho wrote:
> At 11:58 AM -0400 07/23/99, Nelson Minar wrote:
> >Could it really just be
Paul Ho writes:
> No problem here. Netscape communicator 4.61 from Redhat rpm on
> RedHat 6.0 with updates from (updates|rawhide).redhat.com
Interesting. So 4.61 seems not to be the (only) culprit. However,
4.5, 4.6, and 4.61 all had nasty Java problems for me, under both
RedHat 5.2 with update
> Nelson Minar writes:
> > >I've not had that many problems with Netscape and Java.
> >
> > Could it really just be me?
>
> No. I finally had to disable Netscape 4.61 Java. I'd say 75% of all
> applets cause either the 100%-CPU-utilization problem or the
> instant-Netscape-crash problem.
Hav
At 11:58 AM -0400 07/23/99, Nelson Minar wrote:
>Could it really just be me? I'm running pretty basic Netscape, about
>the only change I made was running Fortify over the browser. Trivial
>applets like
>
>http://nelson.www.media.mit.edu/people/nelson/research/mas964/ps2/CircleRepetition.html
>ar
Nelson Minar wrote:
>
> So basically, Netscape 4.61 is whacked for Java. On Redhat 6.0, Redhat
> 5.2, and Debian potato. Yay!
>
> What's frustrating is this stuff used to work. I was using Netscape
> 4.5 for the longest time with Java with no problems. So maybe it's a
> recent Netscape bug, rath
So basically, Netscape 4.61 is whacked for Java. On Redhat 6.0, Redhat
5.2, and Debian potato. Yay!
What's frustrating is this stuff used to work. I was using Netscape
4.5 for the longest time with Java with no problems. So maybe it's a
recent Netscape bug, rather than a Linux version problem.
I
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Nelson Minar wrote:
> Could it really just be me? I'm running pretty basic Netscape, about
> the only change I made was running Fortify over the browser. Trivial
> applets like
>
>http://nelson.www.media.mit.edu/people/nelson/research/mas964/ps2/CircleRepetition.html
> are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:
> >I've not had that many problems with Netscape and Java.
>
> Could it really just be me? I'm running pretty basic Netscape, about
> the only change I made was running Fortify over the browser. Trivial
> applets like
>
>http://nelson.www.media.mit.ed
Nelson Minar writes:
> >I've not had that many problems with Netscape and Java.
>
> Could it really just be me?
No. I finally had to disable Netscape 4.61 Java. I'd say 75% of all
applets cause either the 100%-CPU-utilization problem or the
instant-Netscape-crash problem.
Best,
daniel dulitz
20 matches
Mail list logo
