Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-12 Thread Steve Fink
> So what can you do? Either of the following should work: > > * Run `configure' with the same prefix argument you've used for glibc 2.0.x > so that the same paths are used. > * Replace /lib/ld-linux.so.2 with a link to the dynamic linker from glibc > 2.1. > > You can even call the dynamic

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
> Elena Vorisi & Edoardo Comar writes: Elena> Hi. Elena> excuse me, it surely is a newbie question ... Elena> assuming my system is using glibc2.1, which resides in /lib Elena> why can't I install a glibc2.0 in a /glibc2.0 directory under my home dir Elena> and have only selected apps (as f

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-06 Thread Elena Vorisi & Edoardo Comar
Hi. excuse me, it surely is a newbie question ... assuming my system is using glibc2.1, which resides in /lib why can't I install a glibc2.0 in a /glibc2.0 directory under my home dir and have only selected apps (as for instance jdk12_pre_v1) use it, executing them from a shell where I have set

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-05 Thread Steve Byrne
"Andy Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How involved is it to fix the problems caused by the glibc 2.1 > > changes? Where > > can I read more about the evolution of Linux threads from the 1.x > > kernel on? It > > seems almost all the sticky Java problems on Linux relate to the > > thr

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
Terry Sikes wrote: > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > There was an interesting comment in a column in the current Linux > > Journal: evidently glibc 2.0 was an "experimental" release. Problem > > is... it was a widely adopted experimental release. The JDK is in good > > company: many applications we

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-02 Thread Terry Sikes
Nathan Meyers wrote: > There was an interesting comment in a column in the current Linux > Journal: evidently glibc 2.0 was an "experimental" release. Problem > is... it was a widely adopted experimental release. The JDK is in good > company: many applications were broken by the move to 2.1, whic

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
Stefan Proels wrote: > It is not really a "limitation", it's an incompatibility. RH6 is based > on glibc2.1, while JDK1.2 with native threads currently only works with > glibc2.0. Both have pthread support, but some details are different. > The people porting the JDK have stated that this problem

Re: RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-02 Thread Stefan Proels
> It seems the consensus "solution" for running the 1.2 JDK under RH6 is to be > SURE you are running green threads (in addition to disabling the JIT). All > the associated comments seem to echo "RH6 doesn't support native threads". > What does this REALLY mean ? > > Does this mean that pthread

RedHat 6, JDK 1.2. native threads & JNI

1999-06-02 Thread Andy Levine
It seems the consensus "solution" for running the 1.2 JDK under RH6 is to be SURE you are running green threads (in addition to disabling the JIT). All the associated comments seem to echo "RH6 doesn't support native threads". What does this REALLY mean ? Does this mean that pthread support is mi