15 AM
Subject: Re: Slow loading on AMD Elan 486
>
>On 26-May-99 Daniel Barclay wrote:
>> I also think that since most people (and probably the JDK porters) have
>> faster machines, the problem isn't noticed by many people so it isn't
>> fixed (or, if not fixabl
On 26-May-99 Daniel Barclay wrote:
> I also think that since most people (and probably the JDK porters) have
> faster machines, the problem isn't noticed by many people so it isn't
> fixed (or, if not fixable, listed as a known problem).
My machine is fast, but loading and execution are extremel
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
>
> Yes. And top shows that during the loading process X is taking on the order
> of 80% of processor time, java most of the rest. This is perhaps strange
> because during this period no visible painting related to the applet is
> happening.
I saw that problem too
At 11:01 PM 3/3/99 -0500, I wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Running
Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development >> board (486,
33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load >> times (up to
an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a desktop >> linux
My apologies to the list for my apparently misguided remarks re. buying new
hardware.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:10 AM 3/4/99 -0800, Kevin Ryan wrote:
>The 1.1.7v1a JDK runs great on my AMD DX4-100 w/32Mb RAM.
>
>Since one can get something roughly 20x as fast as my machine for $500
>these days, I'm not sure I understand why agonizing over the JDK's
>performance on a 486/33 is worthwhile.
>
Maybe beca
At 11:01 PM 3/3/99 -0500, Daniel Dulitz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
>> board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
>> times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a des
The 1.1.7v1a JDK runs great on my AMD DX4-100 w/32Mb RAM.
Since one can get something roughly 20x as fast as my machine for $500
these days, I'm not sure I understand why agonizing over the JDK's
performance on a 486/33 is worthwhile.
Linux itself, of course, will run great even on a 386/25 with
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
> board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
> times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a desktop
> linux system. After loadi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
> board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
> times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a desktop
> linux system. After loading, the applet runs
Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a desktop
linux system. After loading, the applet runs OK.
Any ideas what is happening?
11 matches
Mail list logo
