> Uli Luckas writes:
> > Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
> > porters?
> > Maybe they can and don't know it?
>
> I'm sorry, it clearly states in our license agreement (which I don't think I
> can quote) that we have to pass JCK first. IBM has different
Uli Luckas writes:
> Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
> porters?
> Maybe they can and don't know it?
I'm sorry, it clearly states in our license agreement (which I don't think I
can quote) that we have to pass JCK first. IBM has different licensing term
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Uli Luckas wrote:
>
> > Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
> > porters?
>
> But how many people does IBM have working on the porting effort versus
> the number of people working on hte Linux port? And how man
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Uli Luckas wrote:
> Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
> porters?
But how many people does IBM have working on the porting effort versus
the number of people working on hte Linux port? And how many people at
IBM are working on their po
Why can IBM publish an 'almost' ready java 2 VM and why can't the linux
porters?
Maybe they can and don't know it?
"... the vast majority of the Sun 1.2 JCK has run cleanly ..." is what
they say on their downlad page:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/formula.nsf/system/technologies/01F68D163B10330C8
