Re: Uh oh...

1999-02-25 Thread Christopher Rowan
Bet? What bet? ;-) Hmmm... Green threads solved my problems (I hope this is NOT a case of false security!)... Is your version of glibc5 thread safe? Regardless, this is a very serious issue that I hope the developers can take a look at. Now I am REALLY scared. The stuff I work on is as thr

Re: Uh oh...

1999-02-24 Thread sboding
I actually had this happen myself yesterday. I was also running 100% pure java code. My problem was the result of having some of my class files out of sync. Since I'm using a makefile, it wasn't necessarily recompiling all the dependant classes and somehow something got out of sync with the byteco

Re: Uh oh...

1999-02-24 Thread Christopher Rowan
I am willing to bet you are using native threads linked against glibc 2.0.x. DON'T! I'm no authority, but one of the developers kindly informed me that glibc is NOT THREAD SAFE and JDK 1.1.7 doesn't account for this (they might add code to change this behaviour). glibc 2.1 IS THREAD SAFE, but b

Uh oh...

1999-02-24 Thread Dustin Lang
Hi, In fairly normal operation of my fairly large program, I got a "SIGSEGV 11 segmentation violation". Not the right-at-startup-because-you-have-the-wrong-library-version,-stupid type, just smack dab in the middle of my code. The same thing happened earlier today, but I didn't catch the outpu