Re: VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-12 Thread Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira
Hi Jonathan, hi everyone, > Perhaps it is offtopic, but I AM interested. How would you compare > VAJava 2.0 to Visual Cafe or JBuilder 2? I'm wanting to settle on (and learn) > an IDE so I can get the mechanics out of the way and focus on the language. As I got some messages asking for some mo

Re: VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-11 Thread Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira
> I am using both VAJava 2.0 and Symantec Visual Cafe 3.0 for my > development efforts. Both products a comparable interms of price for the > base product , around $99. The upgrade from VAJava 1.0 into VAJava 2.0 costed $ 0 for whoever registered before October 31st, 1998. How much did the upgrad

Re: VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-11 Thread Alex Rice
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 18:44:42 -0500, Jonathan Mark Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Jonathan> I've been seeing a lot of favorable stuff about VA Java 2.0. I'll try to bring this on topic (sort of) for java-linux: sign the petition for porting IBM Visual Age for Java to Linux. It's on Scott Stanc

Re: VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-11 Thread Christopher Hinds
I am using both VAJava 2.0 and Symantec Visual Cafe 3.0 for my development efforts. Both products a comparable interms of price for the base product , around $99. However I find the VAJava 2.0 to be a bit slow because if SmallTalk like source workspace and repository which manages both version co

Re: VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-11 Thread Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira
> I've been seeing a lot of favorable stuff about VA Java 2.0. > > My understanding is that VAJava Pro 2.0 is also only $99 bux, which > is another point in its favor for ME. Yes, and even tough the version 1.0 was just $99.99 everyone who registered before October 31st has received (or is about

VisualAge for Java 2.0

1998-12-11 Thread Jonathan Mark Brooks
I've been seeing a lot of favorable stuff about VA Java 2.0. My understanding is that VAJava Pro 2.0 is also only $99 bux, which is another point in its favor for ME. -- *