I think that the speed depends on what benchmark you run,
though the new borland jit seems generally faster than the
sunwjit that comes with 1.2pre2.
There's a table of timings of several linux jits versus C
at www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 04:30:33PM -0500, Burkhart,Kelly wrote:
>
>
> What performance does a JIT improve? Are you talking about the time to run
> an uncompiled application with this JIT vs. another JIT (i.e. performance
> improvement is in the JIT compilation not in running the application)?
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Burkhart,Kelly wrote:
>
>
> What performance does a JIT improve? Are you talking about the time to run
> an uncompiled application with this JIT vs. another JIT (i.e. performance
> improvement is in the JIT compilation not in running the application)? Or
> are you saying
comiled code from javac or jikes?
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonio S. R. Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: borland/inprise jit for blackdown 1.2pre2
>
>
>
> I've tes
I've tested Borland javacomp with my 35K lines application, which uses a
lot of swing+threads+rmi, and most of it worked fine (some problems). The
most exciting was the performance improvement in some points.
Important: my code does not run with sunjit ... performs better with tya
... but unfort
On 27-Sep-99 noisebrain wrote:
>
> http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/linux/
It works perfectly. Well, I didn't get a 33% gain in compilation time, only a
15% (maybe because I use the -O flag?), but my game gains a lot of speed and
now is almost as fast (hmmm... less slow :) ) as in windows.
I ran
-
> > From: noisebrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:58 AM
> > Subject: borland/inprise jit for blackdown 1.2pre2
> >
> >
> > >
> > > http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/linux/
> &g
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 03:54:21PM -0400, Tim Reilly wrote:
> I took a look at this, and am intrigued. Can anyone comment on
> how stable the combination of this JIT and the 1.2 pre-release might be (I
> realize it'd be unlikely that anyone's tested this combination yet, I'm
> more concerne
us? Will this go into
> the blackdown release from now on?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: noisebrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:58 AM
> Subject: borland/inprise jit for blackdown 1.2pre2
>
&
Sorry to sound arrogant... but how does this effect us? Will this go into
the blackdown release from now on?
- Original Message -
From: noisebrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 11:58 AM
Subject: borland/inprise jit for black
I took a look at this, and am intrigued. Can anyone comment on
how stable the combination of this JIT and the 1.2 pre-release might be (I
realize it'd be unlikely that anyone's tested this combination yet, I'm
more concerned with the maturity of the 1.2 JDK)?
I'm currently using
http://www.borland.com/jbuilder/linux/
"
The JBuilder JIT for Linux preview release is based on the
proven JBuilder JIT for Windows that has been shipping for
over three years and provides significant performance
improvements for Java 2 applications on the Linux p
12 matches
Mail list logo
