Re: Missing message (Was: address for ibm jdk bugs?)

2001-01-08 Thread Joi Ellis
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote: > Joi, > > I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident, > but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For > instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like > someone deleted you

Re: Missing message (Was: address for ibm jdk bugs?)

2001-01-07 Thread Vladimir G Ivanovic
Joi, I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident, but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like someone deleted your posting. Just asking. ---Vladimir Vladimir G. Ivanovic

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Joi Ellis
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mo DeJong wrote: > Go to the news server: > > news.software.ibm.com > > The newsgroup is: > > ibm.software.java.linux After you post, go back a day or so later and see if your post is still there. I went there about 6 months ago to report a big problem using the debugger

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Scott Murray
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, noisebrain wrote: > Hello, > > does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested > seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs > but not in blackdown or sun. No email address that I could find, but the "Reporting Problems" section in t

Re: address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread Mo DeJong
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, noisebrain wrote: > > Hello, > > does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested > seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs > but not in blackdown or sun. Go to the news server: news.software.ibm.com The newsgroup is: ibm.sof

address for ibm jdk bugs?

2001-01-07 Thread noisebrain
Hello, does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs but not in blackdown or sun. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Reporting bugs

1999-05-10 Thread Peter Schuller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm curious; on the new JDK 1.2 status page, it says that if one knows of any bugs not listed there, one should report them. Well, what about the Jitterbug? Should I re-report bugs that are not on the status pages, even if they've al

Port to FreeBSD while you are waiting to on kernel bugs.

1999-03-10 Thread Edward Ing
Only kidding.    

bugs bugs bugs, maybe not.

1999-03-09 Thread Fabian E. Schonholz
Hello; I tried running jdk1.2 on RedHat 5.2 with no luck. No matter what I do libjava.so is not found. So I upgraded the libs, such as glibc, libc, egcc, libstdc++, etc. I still get the same error, plus, I can not run jdk1.1.7 due to a missing symbol. A suggestion is to provide different compile

My reply to Bug 112 (now in known bugs)

1998-08-22 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, Did you receive my reply to Bug 112 (now in known bugs)? Is this the same error that caused you earlier error message? Thanks, Kevin -- Kevin B. Hendricks Associate Professor, Operations & Information Technology School of Busi

bugs

1998-07-06 Thread Laszlo Szenttornyai
bugs in Java 1.1.6 on redhat 5.1 *** Datagram Socket receive after about 15 minutes inactive Datagram receive, the receive throws an IOException the receive cannot throw IOException just in case of IO problem! *** setResizable setResizable( false ) disable the resize function for

JDK 1.1.6v* WM related bugs

1998-06-12 Thread Marko Macek
Hi! I noticed the following problems in recent releases of Linux jdk 1.1.6. RedHat 5.0 glibc version of jdk, no dynamic Motif Window Manager: fvwm2, icewm (http://ixtas.fri.uni-lj.si/~markom/icewm/) Port#1: java version "Linux_JDK_1.1.6_v1" Port#2: java version "[EMAIL PROTECTED]:05/29/98-18:5