On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, John R. MacMillan wrote:
> Where can I find the 1.3.0 source diffs? I've poked around the
> website and ftp mirrors, and the mailing list archive but haven't
> found anything.
There are no 1.3.0 diffs currently. I'll make a diff against the SCSL
c
Where can I find the 1.3.0 source diffs? I've poked around the website
and ftp mirrors, and the mailing list archive but haven't found
anything.
Thanks,
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
ce tree. If so, how can I get a copy
of the Blackdown diffs for this latest release?
I realize everyone on the porting team is probably swamped, and I'm
ready and willing to tackle a few issues myself and submit patches,
but it's been incredibly difficult to even get started. For 1.2
Nathan Meyers writes:
> On 22 Oct, Greg Wolodkin wrote:
> > p.s. what's the motivation behind pushing the Motif dependencies
> > into libawt.so in the 1.2 builds? This seems to make it
> > impossible to have a Motif application which uses the JNI
> > to do Java stuff (with AWT,
I think this is so that people who use AWT components in a JNI
started Java program do not need to have Motif installed on
the box. With Motif statically linked into libawt.so, this
is not a problem (it was a problem with 1.1.7).
I hope that helps
Mo DeJong
> p.s. what's the motivation behind pu
On 22 Oct, Greg Wolodkin wrote:
> p.s. what's the motivation behind pushing the Motif dependencies
> into libawt.so in the 1.2 builds? This seems to make it
> impossible to have a Motif application which uses the JNI
> to do Java stuff (with AWT, anyway). Probably I'm missing
>
Hi all -
After registering with Sun, all I find there are the 1.2.2 JDK
sources, and a patch from 1.2 -> 1.2.2 that I cannot reverse cleanly.
The diffs available from Blackdown don't apply cleanly (obviously)
to the 1.2.2 Sun tree after doing the patch-o-matic renaming etc.
Can anyone
Hey folks,
Is there any chance of getting the source diffs for JDK 1.2? I'm running a
glibc-2.1.1 based system which does not cope well with the current pre-release
(libc5-based). The previous ports do not run on glibc-2.1 as you are probably
aware, and no new versions have since arrived.
Would it be possible for any of the blackdown developers to create a
binary distribution for glibc-2.1? Alternatively, I would be glad to
work with Linux diffs. A while back I made a move to glibc-2.1 and now I
am stuck without a working jdk since 1.1.7 does not work either and I do
not the 1.1.7
get hold of the old 1.1.7 base
sources, so I need some diffs for the current state of the 1.2 port. I
realise that the blackdown team probably has better things to do that
prepare diffs for a work in progress, but it really would help my work.
Thanks
Jim Moores
---
Jim Moores, PhD Research Student
Is there an ETA for diffs? I want to get this running on FreeBSD
ASAP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My diffs would get u started with the i386 port, it was the i386/easy/first
step port to get my 64 bit port done. if that what u want to do
u can ask me some q's about the src.
gat
David Reeves wrote:
> Ito jdk1.2. The question is it possible to get the current diff's for
>
I wanted to obtain the diffs for the JDK1.1.6, but I got the following
error message.
The requested URL /~sbb/1.1.6/v2/jdk1.1.6.diffs.gz was not found on
this server.
Could you tell me how to get the diffs? I would appreciate it very
much.
Thanks,
Donald Riggs
[EMAIL
This is funny when I worked on the 1.02 JDK port to NextStep I wrote a driver
that
allowed you to do DPS calles from Java. I felt it was th "way to go" Looks
like Sun
is moving in that direction. I suspect this is for Graphics2D support.
The driver is Mach based so not that useful. But if Sun is
As i said i dont know ( knew ? ) about DPS. The call that uses DPS has
been edited out ( ie no shared link undefines ) when this font/shared
lib is loaded in. So now i know, so i'll see if its avail.
gat
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Gnu announced in May (http://www.gnu.org/bulletins/bull24.html) tha
To follow up a little further...
> Uncle George wrote:
>
> > 6) Java seemed to have tried to get fonts working. They require includes
> > from some DPS ( et al ".h" ) files, which are just not available. I also
> > dont know what DPS is, but appears to have something to do with
> > postscript. I
Uncle George wrote:
> 6) Java seemed to have tried to get fonts working. They require includes
> from some DPS ( et al ".h" ) files, which are just not available. I also
> dont know what DPS is, but appears to have something to do with
> postscript. It has been edited ( mangled) to compile, and w
redhat/Linux 5.2 system. The diffs are used on that version that was
distributed from the non-commercial center( December 1 1998 ?). They can
be found on:
http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK/1.2/jdk12.diffs.gz
The diffs are enough to build all of the JDK 1.2, although it isn't very
Dan Kegel writes:
> Oddly enough, the only one I've found is
> ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/JDK-1.1.6/i386/glibc/v4a/
Are the source diffs to the stock JDK 1.1.6 distribution
available somewhere?
b.
19 matches
Mail list logo