$)C
REMOVE
Juergen Kreileder @[<:GT:
> > Jason Dillon writes:
>
> Jason> This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the
> Jason> only java related group that I am subscribed to. I am
> Jason> wondering if a native method is specified as synchronized
> Jason> if t
Cool... thank you for your help.
--jason
On 11-Jan-99 Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>> Jason Dillon writes:
>
> Jason> Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not
> Jason> really mention anything about native methods (not in that
> Jason> section anyways). I am wonde
> Jason Dillon writes:
Jason> Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not
Jason> really mention anything about native methods (not in that
Jason> section anyways). I am wondering if it is safe to assume
Jason> that marking a native method as synchronized will
Does this apply to native methods as well? The docs do not really mention
anything about native methods (not in that section anyways). I am wondering if
it is safe to assume that marking a native method as synchronized will
automagicly protect the object from access by other threads or if I have
> Jason Dillon writes:
Jason> This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the
Jason> only java related group that I am subscribed to. I am
Jason> wondering if a native method is specified as synchronized
Jason> if the jvm will perform the proper MontiorEnter &
Jas
This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the only java related group
that I am subscribed to. I am wondering if a native method is specified as
synchronized if the jvm will perform the proper MontiorEnter & MonitorExit
calls or if I should call them in the native method.
So for exampl
