Nick Bailey writes:
> "In the interim, there had been some bit-rot and, after some effort, the
> code will compile, but not
> run." (on the Unix page). They are working on it, though. The
> Microsoft version works fine. Good luck to porting team, though!
>
> I've no criticism on the Netscape/Mo
The bit I had in mind was:
"In the interim, there had been some bit-rot and, after some effort, the
code will compile, but not
run." (on the Unix page). They are working on it, though. The
Microsoft version works fine. Good luck to porting team, though!
I've no criticism on the Netscape/Mozill
Nick Bailey writes:
> ...but have you read the Unix page?
>
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ef/unixbuild.html
>
> Another one in the eye for Linux users wanting efficient Java. Also,
> the main page says "get JDK 1.2, then..."
I don't understand how this is a problem. They say you need JDK
...but have you read the Unix page?
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ef/unixbuild.html
Another one in the eye for Linux users wanting efficient Java. Also,
the main page says "get JDK 1.2, then..."
So it will be a time yet before anything of use comes out, reading
between the lines. There's n
