On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Robert Pottschmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgive me for this post I am a newbie to system adm. Our setup is an
>academic server. Running Redhat 6.1 with Apache and Jserv. Our problem deals with a
>lab we assigned that all of our users where to do an applet using swin
Hi all,
Summary:
I have a peculiar situation, briefly, I want to write a Daemon/Server in Java
which will listen to the Pop port and service Pop requests from clients.
Setup:
--
I have a Redhat Linux 6 system, and I have jdk-1.1.8 on it.
Details:
I want the behaviour
Hello all,
> I say syntactically because this is the strict translation of your code.
> A good compiler could optimize away this difference. The compilers have
> special handling of String object in a few places anyway.
Be careful here - the java language requires two identical string
constants
> "Jacob" == Jacob Nikom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> This is not really Java-Linux, but more like Java question.
> May be it is different for Java Linux implementation, that is
> why I decided to ask.
Actually, the language specification is pretty specific in this area -
see JLS (2n
Hi,
I would like to thank all people in discussion, especially Chris.
I had never looked at bytecodes before. As far as I see the
call to the String constructor is in the line 3.
It is interesting to know how different bytecodes could be in
different compilers.
Regards,
Jacob Nikom
Chris Ab
Hello ,
I am searching from last one week over the net for software which converts
the given bytecode into the executable format.Does anyone have any idea about
this.If so please mail me , I am in desperate need of it.
Thank U,
Satish
-
Check out the Java front-end to gcc (GCJ): http://sources.redhat.com/java/
Peace.
Tom
satish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/08/2000 09:18:29 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Tom Williams/HQ/dssi)
Subject: making executable of bytecode
H
Note the Java[TM] 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SETM), v 1.3 for
Linux, Release Candidate on
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
Cafe au Lait says "There aren't any new features here, just bug fixes
and performance improvements." Still, some interes
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:48:29PM +0530, satish wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
> I am searching from last one week over the net for software which converts
> the given bytecode into the executable format.Does anyone have any idea about
> this.If so please mail me , I am in desperate need of it.
Loo
Jonathan Doughty wrote:
>
> Note the Java[TM] 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SETM), v 1.3 for
> Linux, Release Candidate on
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
>
> Cafe au Lait says "There aren't any new features here, just bug fixes
> and performa
Jonathan Doughty wrote:
>
> Note the Java[TM] 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SETM), v 1.3 for
> Linux, Release Candidate on
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
>
> Cafe au Lait says "There aren't any new features here, just bug fixes
> and performa
I was able to get the RPM downloaded and it checksummed ok, but the install
failed because "glibc >= 2.1.2-11 is needed by jre-1.3-rc1". I have
glibc-2.1.3 installed on my RedHat system.
Go figure...
Peace.
Tom
Joi Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/08/2000 01:05:57 PM
Please respon
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Joi Ellis wrote:
[snipped]
> I tried to download the bugger last night, from three different
> ftp links and the http link, and using both Netscape and Lynx.
> The slightly-truncated file won't install itself because it fails
> its checksum test.
>
> Every single download
Man Chi Ly wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> I just downloaded it from the main ftp site: ftp.java.sun.com
> It took about 4 minutes on a fairly good pipe here at work. I ran the
> script to unpack it, and tested the rpm. I didn't see any errors, but I'm
> not ready yet to install it until I get home an
At 09:08 9/8/00 -0400, Jacob Nikom wrote:
>I would like to thank all people in discussion, especially Chris.
your welcome. :)
>I had never looked at bytecodes before. As far as I see the
>call to the String constructor is in the line 3.
the bytecode at offset 3:
3 new #11
is an instance
15 matches
Mail list logo
