Re: RangeFilter

Thanks for clarifying this, Chris! I agree with you that javadocs usual should doc all they do but often times they skip few important things they do do. Chris Hostetter wrote: : Does anyone know if the RangeFilter is a cached filter? I could not : tell from the api. Generally speaking cla

Re: RangeFilter

: Does anyone know if the RangeFilter is a cached filter? I could not : tell from the api. Generally speaking classes only document what they do, not what they *don't* do ... so if the javadocs don't say anything about caching, then it doesn't have any caching. more specificly, the existence of

Re: Cannot get Field.Text to work

: Thanks for the reply. I didn't know that as all the examples on Lucene still : use the old approach. : I had a look at the API and it does not seem to provide any new methods as : a substitute for Field.Text. Please note there is a FAQ specificly about "How do I get code written for Lucene 1.4

RangeFilter

Hi All, Does anyone know if the RangeFilter is a cached filter? I could not tell from the api. Thanks! Jay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: document field indexing

Hello John, see another thread about this issue this morning. Due to index performance in combination with an inverted index it is not possible what you want. Regards Ard > > Hi > Lets say we have a single lucene document that has two text fields: > field1 and field2. > Data kept in field1

Re: document field indexing

No. One of the most frequent requests is update-in-place, but if you search the mail archive you'll find the reasons why it's not going to happen. Erick On 7/10/07, john smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Lets say we have a single lucene document that has two text fields: field1 and field2. D

document field indexing

Hi Lets say we have a single lucene document that has two text fields: field1 and field2. Data kept in field1 is a long string that changes rarely. It takes some time to index it. Data kept in field2 is a short string and changes often. Is it possible to update (reindex) document field2 withou

Re: How to use "point-in-time" feature

In your application, can more than one machine be the writer? If so, there is at least one known active issue (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-948) in Lucene 2.2 that prevents this from working. If instead the writer is always on a single machine, then it should work, though please no

Re: unused tmp fdt files in index

What version of Lucene are you using? As of 2.1, Lucene should remove such partially created files immediately on hitting the OOM exception, and if somehow it failed to do that (eg if JVM had crashed or machine running JVM crashed, etc) it should then remove them the next time a writer is created

Re: Cannot get Field.Text to work

Hi Andy, Thanks for the example, i tried it and it works like a charm :) I will explore more of Lucene on my own. Amit On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can reference org.apache.lucene.document.Field class. It should be similar as: ontactDocument.add(new Field("nam

RE: Cannot get Field.Text to work

You can reference org.apache.lucene.document.Field class. It should be similar as: ontactDocument.add(new Field("name", contact.getName(),Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED)); Andy -Original Message- From: Amit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 6:00 PM To: java-

Re: Cannot get Field.Text to work

Hi Otis, Thanks for the reply. I didn't know that as all the examples on Lucene still use the old approach. I had a look at the API and it does not seem to provide any new methods as a substitute for Field.Text. Can you give a small example just how to add name-value pair to the document. Thanks

RE: Calling indexWriter.close() in web app

Hi, you do not need to writer.close() the IndexWriter at all to make changes visible. When IndexWriter is constructed with autoCommit = true flag set, calling writer.flush() will do. This way you can keep your single IndexWriter at App-level handling all the synchonization. Have a look at

How to use "point-in-time" feature

Hi, I saw the new feature "point-in-time" on Lucene2.2. If I upgrade my web-app from Lucene2.0 to Lucene2.2, I want to do that my web-app can access the INDEX over NFS , so what should I do to change my old web-app. Could anyone show me some samples or your opinions. (i.e. what difference on m

Re: unused tmp fdt files in index

I need to remove these on the production server. Luke can be used only on windows right? Can I use Lucli for the same purpose? Thanks, Harini On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can use Luke to open your index. In the Files tab, if some files are shown as deletable, it