: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the
subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which t
: Message-ID:
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the
subject line of your email
It takes roughly 6 hours for me to index a Gig of data. The benchmarks take
quite a bit less if I'm reading it correctly. I'll try out the
StringBuffer/Builder and let you know. Thanks for the quick response and if
you have any more suggestions please let me know.
--JP
On 8/11/07, karl wettin
: I want to cut of records which has score below a threshold.
:
: Without DocCollector.
this would be meaningless even if it were easier...
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-912c1f237bb00259185353182948e5935f0c2f03
FAQ: "Can I filter by score?"
-Hoss
-
oops...that was a control-c control-v error. Im indexing directory "c:\test"
and using the
index in c:\test for searching. I found the problem to be this - Im reusing
the same document
object in the for loop. I solved it by creating new document each time the
loop runs...
actually when if statement
Hi all,
Lucene query parser synax page
(http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html) provides
the following two examples of range query:
mod_date:[20020101 TO 20030101]
and
title:{Aida TO Carmen}
Now my question is, numerically 10 is greater than 2, but in
string-only comparison 2 i
How much slower than anticipated is it?
I would start by using a StringBuffer/Builder rather than appending
(immutable) strings to each other.
11 aug 2007 kl. 19.05 skrev John Paul Sondag:
Hi,
I was hoping that maybe you guys could see if I'm somehow indexing
inefficiently. I'm putting rele
With Compass, indexing is linked to your database transaction, when
your object is persisted, it's indexed too.
All your questions are managed cleanly and silently by Compass, just
have a look to the source code if you don't wont to use this product.
M.
Le 10 août 07 à 12:24, Antonello Prove
Hi,
I was hoping that maybe you guys could see if I'm somehow indexing
inefficiently. I'm putting relevant parts of my code below. I've looked at
the "benchmarks" page on Lucene and my indexing time is taking a substantial
amount of time more than what I see posted. I'm not sure when I should c
A couple of things come to mind. But before I get to them, really, really,
really get a copy of Luke. It'll allow you to examine your index and
see if what's in there is really what you expect. It'll save you a world
of hurt Google luke lucene
Also, use query.toString to see what the quer
Chris,
Your solution is very interesting and I would like to consider it. At
the moment I'm going to focus on (N)Hibernate Search (in the .NET
version is released in the SVN), which also covers the requirement of
persistence.
If the result of the tests won't be successful, I will immediately
focu
On Saturday 11 August 2007 02:20, Aleesh wrote:
> Need your help regarding reading existing index. Actually I am trying
> to read an existing index ans just wanted to know, is there a way to
> identify type of 'Analyzer' which was used at the index creation time?
That information is not part of
12 matches
Mail list logo
