Hi,
Is there any way to migrate a Lucene index to Elastic Search? Read
somewhere that it is possible through a Java app which would read the
documents from the Lucene index and then write it to the ES cluster. Is
that possible and if yes, how? Still a newbie with all this :p
Thanks in
Hi
Background: My company has built an Android application that utilizes
Lucene 4.7.0 to index and search upon a fairly static set of about 100,000
documents. We have used numerous versions of Lucene over the years, and
they have all worked well to accomplish this purpose.
Issue: Upon
Hi Akshay
It is better to post the question in Elastic Search group.
If you have the data, it is better to direclty create index from Elastic
Search.
Regards
Aditya
www.findbestopensource.com
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:34 PM, akshay.jain akshay.j...@orkash.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way
And also clarify whether you are simply looking for how to change your
Lucene code to write out an ES-compatible index vs. how to move the data
from your Lucene index into a true ES index. Some of the answers in the past
are that you can only move stored fields that you can read from Lucene
Hi Jack,
What I want to do is to move the data from a Lucene index into an ES index.
Thanks,
Akshay
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
In this situation you need to first, using 4.5.1, upgrade your
entire index to the supported postings format ... then 4.8 can read
the index.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Michael Poindexter
statics...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an index that was
Hi,
As per the post The Generics Policeman Blog
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
, I am using the MMapDirectory for faster access(search and update
operations ,mainly search) of Lucene 4.8.1 index files. I am contemplating
what is the optimal maximum MMap
Hi,
1 GiB is the maximum possible. The chunk size is only applicable for 32 bit
JDKs because of limited address space.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Gaurav gupta
Thanks Uwe for the insight !
Also, is it advisable to set the lower chunk size for smaller indexes, like
below or let Lucene/OS manage by itself. I am just guessing that assigning
lower value to smaller index will make sure that bigger index are getting
higher mmap address space.
*Index Name
