Re: Lucene Migration query

2020-11-20 Thread Michael Sokolov
Ah, sorry for the misdirection, thanks for the correction, Erick. That does jibe with what I now remember having heard before. I guess we reserve the right to create index data structures in the future for which we did not save sufficient data in the past. On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:15 AM Erick Eri

Re: Lucene Migration query

2020-11-20 Thread Erick Erickson
The IndexUpgraderTool does a forceMerge(1). If you have a large index, that has its own problems, but will work. The threshold for the issues is 5G. See: https://lucidworks.com/post/solr-and-optimizing-your-index-take-ii/ I should emphasize that if you have a very large single segment as a result,

Re: Lucene Migration query

2020-11-20 Thread Michael Sokolov
I think running the upgrade tool would also be necessary to set you up for the next upgrade, when 9.0 comes along. On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 4:25 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > Currently I am using Lucene 7.3, I want to upgrade to lucene 8.5.1. > Should > > I do reindexing in this case ? > > No

RE: Lucene Migration query

2020-11-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > Currently I am using Lucene 7.3, I want to upgrade to lucene 8.5.1. Should > I do reindexing in this case ? No, you don't need that. > Can I make use of backward codec jar without a reindex? Yes, just add the JAR file to your classpath and it can read the indexes. Updates written to the