Re: BigIntegerPoint

2021-02-27 Thread Michael Kleen
ok, thanks a lot for the clarification. > On 27. Feb 2021, at 13:23, Adrien Grand wrote: > > It's indeed working. As Robert suggested, it's in the sandbox more because > it's unclear if it is really needed than because it is unstable. > > The few data points I have suggest that among the users

Re: BigIntegerPoint

2021-02-27 Thread Adrien Grand
It's indeed working. As Robert suggested, it's in the sandbox more because it's unclear if it is really needed than because it is unstable. The few data points I have suggest that among the users for whom LongPoint is not enough, there are more users who need unsigned 64 bits integers than true 12

Re: BigIntegerPoint

2021-02-27 Thread Michael Kleen
Looking at TestBigIntegerPoint it seems to me that the core functionality of BigIntegerPoint is working. Is there any reason you would advise me for not using it ? Is there anything missing ? > On 26. Feb 2021, at 22:14, Robert Muir wrote: > > It was added to the sandbox originally (along with

fuzzy search with multiple terms

2021-02-27 Thread Greg Huber
Hello, I am trying to get a fuzzy search to work, maybe I am not understanding how it is supposed to work, can someone put me in the right direction?  It seems to be always doing an OR when I use BooleanClause.Occur.MUST (for loop).  Latest version of lucene. eg for a term stone brick is i