Hi all,
Once again, thanks for the responses! After thinking about this a bit more,
I think Michael's response makes sense now. I do agree that partial matches
shouldn't be ranked higher than conjunctive matches, so I think it doesn't
make sense in my use case to use a DisjunctiveMinQuery (I
Hi,
in that case you should use something like 1/x as your scoring function
in the sub-clauses. In Lucene scores should go up for more relevancy.
This must also apply for function scoring.
Uwe
Am 09.11.2023 um 19:14 schrieb Marc D'Mello:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the response! So to answer
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the response! So to answer your first question, yes this would
keep the lowest score from the matching sub-scorers. Our use case is that
we have a custom term-level score overriding term frequency and we want to
take the min of that as part of our scoring function. Maybe
