m); ?
On 10/12/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Apache Lucene wrote:
> When I am adding a document to the lucene index if the method
> throws an
> IOException and if I continue with adding other documents ignoring the
> exception, will
When I am adding a document to the lucene index if the method throws an
IOException and if I continue with adding other documents ignoring the
exception, will the index be corrupted? What happens to the fields which are
already written to the index?
BTW, I could access that index using Luke. It works fine.
On 3/7/06, Apache Lucene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This line is throwing a null pointer exception for the index I created as
> I mentioned in my previous emails.
>
> searcher = new IndexSearcher(Index
wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Apache Lucene wrote:
>
> > Is it advisable to use compound file format? or should I revert it
> > back to
> > simple file format? How do I revert it back?
>
> There is a setter on IndexWriter to set it back if you like.
le contains all those individual parts.
>
> -Yonik
>
> On 3/7/06, Apache Lucene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >I am using Lucene 1.9.1 to index the files. The index writer
> created
> > the following files
> > (1) segment file "segmen
Hi,
I am using Lucene 1.9.1 to index the files. The index writer created
the following files
(1) segment file "segments"
(2) deletable file "deletable"
(3) compound file "cfs"
None of the other files like term info, frequency..etc were created. Is
there something obvious, I am doing wrong?
