RE: using phrase query with wildcard

2012-07-22 Thread Doron Yaacoby
Is * a placeholder for a term or a part of a term? -Original Message- From: Levin, Ilya [mailto:ilya.le...@hp.com] Sent: 22 July 2012 11:29 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: using phrase query with wildcard Hi, I'm trying to create a phrase query with wildcard, from the forums it

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-18 Thread Doron Yaacoby
Thanks for the input. I am not using Solr. Also, my index has a fixed size, I am not going to update it. -Original Message- From: googoo [mailto:liu...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 July 2012 15:21 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: In memory Lucene configuration Doron, To verify actual

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-18 Thread Doron Yaacoby
configuration doron, enlighten me please! On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Doron Yaacoby wrote: > Glad to announce the problem was on my side, and had nothing to do with > Lucene. Indeed, looks like that MMapDirectory is the best choice for me. > > Thanks again. > > -Original M

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-18 Thread Doron Yaacoby
Glad to announce the problem was on my side, and had nothing to do with Lucene. Indeed, looks like that MMapDirectory is the best choice for me. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doron Yaacoby [mailto:dor...@gingersoftware.com] Sent: 16 July 2012 09:43 To: java-user

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-15 Thread Doron Yaacoby
t to be well worth it. Due to GC overhead and poor synchronization characteristics, RAMDirectory is definitely not the way to go at this scale, as you probably already suspect. On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Doron Yaacoby wrote: > Thanks for the quick input! > I ran a few more tes

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-15 Thread Doron Yaacoby
claims them? I can't really explain this phenomenon in the RAMDirectory case. I'm currently trying to recreate this by sleeping a random time before each query, but still without success. Will update... -----Original Message- From: Doron Yaacoby [mailto:dor...@gingersoftware.com

RE: In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-15 Thread Doron Yaacoby
;t mention before that I'm using Lucene 3.5 and Java 1.7. -Original Message- From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 July 2012 11:56 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: In memory Lucene configuration hey there, On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Doron

In memory Lucene configuration

2012-07-15 Thread Doron Yaacoby
Hi, I have the following situation: I have two pretty large indices. One consists of about 1 billion documents (takes ~6GB on disk) and the other has about 2 billion documents (~10GB on disk). The documents are very short (4-5 terms each in the text field, and one numeric field with a long valu