fernet analyzer, two acctually: one used when indexing and one used
when quering...
http://incubator.apache.org/solr/
: Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:53:24 -0600
: From: Jeremy Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Alpha
I am trying to search by a number of fields including an alphanumeric
model id.
This is just the model id that comes from manufacturers. I've tried
to use a StandardAnalyzer and a SnowballAnalyzer to index the data.
Then I search with the associated analyzer using a
MultiFieldQueryParse
question for the Quartz mailing list rather than this
one) is the spawning of user threads issue. That kind
of thing makes me nervous in an app server context,
but lots of people use Quartz for J2EE scheduling so
it must be fairly stable.
What was your experience of it?
Many thanks
Marc
I'm pretty new with this, but with my index for a database, I'm using
a Quartz scheduler. Also at the end of the index update, I set my
singleton of IndexSearcher to null. That way the index searcher will
be using the latest information. That bit as well as setting it to
null and not clo
igh boost value, to see if it would
bring that single ANDed record towards the top, but nothing. Am I
doing something wrong in all of this? Am I doing the boost wrong or
something?
On Apr 14, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Michael D. Curtin wrote:
Jeremy Hanna wrote:
I would use a database functi
hing we
needed for presentation within the Lucene index. We saw a net
performance increase AND simpler code when we did this.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 4/14/06 1:15 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Subject:Re:
wrote:
On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote:
Looking at the results, the first document in the results should
hopefully be near the bottom and the Explanation for this document
has a Description/Details (using the toString() on the
Explanation) of:
product of:
0.0 = sum of:
rcher.explain() for a specific query and
document to trace how things are being scored. Is it possible
you're boosting all documents by the same amount?
Erik
On Apr 13, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote:
I have a situation where I'm indexing database entries and have
I have a situation where I'm indexing database entries and have
fields such as:
name
sku
model
category name
description
features
specifications
I am trying to set a priority higher for the name, category name, and
description.
I've tried setting the fields' boost values as I've indexed th
I have a situation where I'm indexing database entries and have
fields such as:
name
sku
model
category name
description
features
specifications
I am trying to set a priority higher for the name, category name, and
description.
I've tried setting the fields' boost values as I've indexed th
10 matches
Mail list logo