RE: Possible to "quickly" fetch count of other terms based on a query

2013-02-22 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
count of other terms based on a query On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Lars-Erik Aabech wrote: > Thanks. > > ANDing was what I ment with "combined" queries. > I think I'll go with that one for now and see how it performs. Not too > many docs/terms in the index. (~150

RE: Possible to "quickly" fetch count of other terms based on a query

2013-02-22 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
I guess it performs alright :P Overall Elapsed:00:00:00.0290029 (29ms) Lars-Erik -Original Message- From: Lars-Erik Aabech [mailto:l...@markedspartner.no] Sent: 22. februar 2013 12:09 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Possible to "quickly" fetc

RE: Possible to "quickly" fetch count of other terms based on a query

2013-02-22 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
custom collector call .advance on each, for each collected docID, and increment counts if that term matches that doc. Or you could just do a separate query for each of the terms of interest AND'd with your original query. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Feb 2

Possible to "quickly" fetch count of other terms based on a query

2013-02-22 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
ld a second index, though.. (I guess I could do a new "combined" query for each term in the set, but if any other way it'd be nice) mvh. Lars-Erik Aabech Faglig leder utvikling MarkedsPartner AS Mobil: +47 920 30 537

RE: Stemming and Wildcard - or fire and water

2012-12-11 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
A possible workaround could be to modify search terms with wildcard tokens by stemming them manually and creating a new search string. Searches for hersen* would be modified to hers* and return what you expect. Con is of course that you search for more than you specified. Lars-Erik > -Origin

RE: Deciding how to use reader

2012-12-10 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
luck. -- Ian. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Lars-Erik Aabech wrote: > OK, thanks. As far as I understand, there's no problem performance wise or > other to use a singleton reader for multiple threads/users, right? > > I've considered Solr, but my conclusion is that inst

RE: Deciding how to use reader

2012-12-10 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
olr? That would probably take care of most of the complications pretty much out of the box. http://lucene.apache.org/solr/features.html -- Ian. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Lars-Erik Aabech wrote: > Hi! > > I'm using lucene.net, but I'm sure this question is not pla

Deciding how to use reader

2012-12-10 Thread Lars-Erik Aabech
searches themselves. My question is as follows, Given ~17,000 documents and ~120,000 terms, would you open and close a reader for each search, or would you keep a singleton reader and re-open it say every hour? mvh. Lars-Erik Aabech Faglig leder utvikling MarkedsPartner AS Mobil: +47 920 30 537