Ganesh [mailto:emailg...@yahoo.co.in]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:01 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing actual sort
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> I agree, the number of unique terms might be less, but [ 4 *
> read
Message -
> From: "Erick Erickson"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing actual sort
>
>
>>I was assuming you were storing things as strings, in which case
>> it works something l
ubject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing actual sort
>I was assuming you were storing things as strings, in which case
> it works something like this:
> Let's say you broke it up into
>
> MM
> DD
> HH
> MM
>
> The number of unique terms tha
esh
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erick Erickson"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing actual sort
>
>
> > Have you tried splitting your times into separate fields, perhap
Hi Ganesh,
I'm not sure whether this will work for you, but one way I got around
this was with multiple searches. I only needed the first 50 results,
but wanted to sort by date,hour,min,sec. This could result in 5
results or millions of results.
I added the date to the query, so I'd search for r
> Ganesh
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erick Erickson"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing actual sort
>
>
>> Have you tried splitting your times into separate f
.
Please correct me if i am wrong. I require some justification to split the date
in to multiple terms.
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Alternative way to simulate sorting without doing a
Have you tried splitting your times into separate fields, perhaps one with
MMDD and another with HHMM, then do a primary sort on the YYYMMDD and
secondary on HHMM. That'll reduce your total unique values greatly and
should improve your memory consumption.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:2
Hello all
I am sorting on datetime with minute resolution. It easily reaches the maximum
heap size. I am having almost 100M records and it is using 1.5 GB. I am now in
a situitation to stop sorting and to find some other alternative way.
I tried adding document boost and field boost for date t
